Skip to comments.
Waco officials seek to quash subpoena issued for Twin Peaks video
Waco Tribune-Herald ^
| June 25, 2015
| TOMMY WITHERSPOON
Posted on 06/25/2015 4:33:52 PM PDT by Prolixus
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-148 next last
The video would therefore support Mr. Clendennens argument that there is no probable cause in his case and that he should not be held on restrictive bond conditions, Brodens motion argues.
1
posted on
06/25/2015 4:33:52 PM PDT
by
Prolixus
To: Prolixus
Doesn’t the prosecutor have an ethical; duty to pursue the truth?
2
posted on
06/25/2015 4:36:43 PM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: Prolixus
One small point. The article says the “matter has been sent to the Attorney General for a ruling.” The AG cannot “rule,” he can only issue an opinion. Only a court can “rule.”
3
posted on
06/25/2015 4:39:18 PM PDT
by
abb
("News reporting is too important to be left to the journalists." Walter Abbott (1950 -))
To: BenLurkin
Not anymore, just ask the ladies in Bal’mer.
4
posted on
06/25/2015 4:43:07 PM PDT
by
MileHi
(Liberalism is an ideology of parasites, hypocrites, grievance mongers, victims, and control freaks.)
To: BenLurkin
How about the Baltimore Six?
5
posted on
06/25/2015 4:48:09 PM PDT
by
ex91B10
(We've tried the Soap Box,the Ballot Box and the Jury Box; ONE BOX LEFT!)
To: Prolixus
The Waco PD is trying very, very hard to keep these videos away from the public. I wonder why....
6
posted on
06/25/2015 4:51:06 PM PDT
by
Lurker
(Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
To: Lurker
The Waco PD is trying very, very hard to keep these videos away from the public. I wonder why.... Brace for incoming with such an outrageous question as that.
7
posted on
06/25/2015 4:54:17 PM PDT
by
don-o
(I am Kenneth Carlisle - Waco 5/17/15)
To: Prolixus
The City of Waco better have one very high coverage liability insurance policy. This whole Twin Peaks matter stinks to the high heavens.
8
posted on
06/25/2015 4:58:37 PM PDT
by
CdMGuy
To: BenLurkin
Just wait until you get a ruling/opinion on “ethical” from traitorous Humpty Dumbty Roberts.....
9
posted on
06/25/2015 5:09:48 PM PDT
by
Paladin2
(Ive given up on aphostrophys and spell chek on my current device...)
To: abb
The matter sent to the Attorney General was the FOIA request from the paper.
10
posted on
06/25/2015 5:12:41 PM PDT
by
USNBandit
(sarcasm engaged at all times)
To: BenLurkin
I don’t understand what pretrial discovery would be? Can anybody explain that?
11
posted on
06/25/2015 5:14:05 PM PDT
by
USNBandit
(sarcasm engaged at all times)
To: USNBandit
I dont understand what pretrial discovery would be? Can anybody explain that?I don't understand your question. Do you have questions about discovery in general, criminal discovery, or something more specific?
12
posted on
06/25/2015 5:22:30 PM PDT
by
PAR35
To: USNBandit
I think I understand that “discovery” is a court date to present evidence, so by saying “pretrial discovery” as if it is something bad, it sounds like you have to wait until you are in court for discovery before you can discover the evidence.
13
posted on
06/25/2015 5:46:56 PM PDT
by
philetus
(Keep doing what you always do and you'll eventually get what you deserve)
To: philetus
14
posted on
06/25/2015 6:06:24 PM PDT
by
don-o
(I am Kenneth Carlisle - Waco 5/17/15)
To: abb
“One small point. The article says the matter has been sent to the Attorney General for a ruling. The AG cannot rule, he can only issue an opinion. Only a court can rule.”
The AG can make an ADMINISTRATIVE ruling. The court can over-rule the administrative ruling with a judicial ruling.
To: don-o; Lurker
The Waco PD is trying very, very hard to keep these videos away from the public. I wonder why....
Brace for incoming with such an outrageous question as that.
That's if the trolls bother to read the article and the early comments.
16
posted on
06/25/2015 6:23:41 PM PDT
by
Prolixus
(Why does Waco make me think of Benghazi?)
To: USNBandit
“I dont understand what pretrial discovery would be? Can anybody explain that?”
There will be a pre-trial hearing. At that time the defense attorney can ask for discovery.
I am not a lawyer but it seems that the defense lawyer wants to try the case in the pre-trial hearing.
To: TexasGator
From the article (posted above)
The video would therefore support Mr. Clendennens argument that there is no probable cause in his case and that he should not be held on restrictive bond conditions, Brodens motion argues.
Art. 16.01. EXAMINING TRIAL
18
posted on
06/25/2015 6:54:13 PM PDT
by
don-o
(I am Kenneth Carlisle - Waco 5/17/15)
To: don-o
“Examining Trials”
Obviously you have no idea what an examining trial is in Texas ...
To: Prolixus
Broden said he sought the video to help him prepare for an Aug. 10 examining trial set in Clendennens case in McLennan County Justice of the Peace W.H. Pete Petersons court. The same JP that set the $1,000,000 bonds on 177. Can we spell recuse?
20
posted on
06/25/2015 7:10:19 PM PDT
by
don-o
(I am Kenneth Carlisle - Waco 5/17/15)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-148 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson