[Cboldt]

Yep. The dissent lost, its words are legally meaningless. All it is is "venting," no different from what many every-day people post here and elsewhere.

Nonetheless, his words and thoughts are interesting. He's a pretty good writer.

[StAnDeliver]

"its words are legally meaningless"

Not true. That dissent and its appropriate legal conclusions can be cited.

Not only that, but there's a plethora of star points in the dissent should any candidate be wise enough to seize upon them, in the cause of starving the Beast, or rewriting Bobocare into oblivion...