Not true. That dissent and its appropriate legal conclusions can be cited.
Not only that, but there's a plethora of star points in the dissent should any candidate be wise enough to seize upon them, in the cause of starving the Beast, or rewriting Bobocare into oblivion...
I’ll grant you your point, but note that it turns on how one chooses to define “legally meaningless.” The point I intended but failed to make was that the dissent is void of legal force, not that it was void of legal argument or persuasive material useful outside of the law, such as scoring political points.