Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BroJoeK

Dred-Scott did not have anything to do with expanding slavery in to northern states.


44 posted on 06/25/2015 6:16:31 AM PDT by WayneS (Don't blow smoke up my ass and tell me it's raining...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: WayneS
Waynes: "Dred-Scott did not have anything to do with expanding slavery in to northern states."

It certainly did!
Certainly in the minds of Northerners it did, and it's legal language was absolutely clear: Africans were not human beings and therefore could never be citizens.
So slaves would remain slaves regardless of where they were taken -- to other slave states, or to non-slave states -- they were still slaves regardless.

In practical effect, that meant Northern states' acts outlawing slavery were themselves unconstitutional, according to the Dred-Scott Supreme Court.

According to Lincoln, Dred-Scott required only one more such decision confirming it to make slavery again lawful in every state, just as it had been back on July 4, 1776.

65 posted on 06/25/2015 7:45:17 AM PDT by BroJoeK (a little historical perspective...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson