Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DiogenesLamp
I agree with the governor's decision. There's no reason to display the confederate battle flag on state property if it's going to antagonize a large percentage of the state's population.

While I fully realize that the Civil War had political dimensions which were outside of the slavery issue, for many black citizens, it did represent, to them, at least, the state endorsing the vestiges of the slavery era.

As such, I think it is wise for the governor to put this issue in the rear view mirror.

Something tells me that the Battle Flag of the Confederacy will still enjoy plenty of expression throughout the state, wherever private citizens, businesses, societies, museums, memorials, etc. think it is appropriate.

I hope that the die-hard Southern Heritage element will not let this stick in their craws. This does not represent a diminishing of the legacy left by the brave and proud soldiers who fought for States Rights in the South.

But the logical association of that symbol with slavery is undeniable, and as such, it should probably not be displayed on public property which is intended to serve a unified South Carolina citizenry. Thus, I don't find it controversial that the Battle Flag of a vanquished foe will no longer be displayed on state grounds.

Flame suit on.

72 posted on 06/22/2015 4:42:11 PM PDT by sargon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: sargon
“. . . I think it is wise for the governor to put this issue in the rear view mirror.”

The orchestrated caving on this issue is probably the way our nation's leadership - Rat and Rino - will cave on marriage. And on firearm ownership. And on Iran getting nuclear weapons - just time to put the issues in the rear view mirror and make peace with the liberals.

78 posted on 06/22/2015 4:54:40 PM PDT by jeffersondem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

To: sargon
I don't find it controversial that the Battle Flag of a vanquished foe will no longer be displayed on state grounds.

Well said and it looks like we're in the minority here. I realize that Free Republic is not a GOP site, marching in lockstep with the Republican party. But is surely is an anti-liberal and thus anti-DemonRAT forum. That's why I find it odd that so many here are supporting a flag that, throughout history, is part and parcel of the political party that opposed not only Lincoln but also Ronald Reagan.


79 posted on 06/22/2015 4:55:00 PM PDT by re_nortex (DP - that's what I like about Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

To: sargon
There's no reason to display the confederate battle flag on state property if it's going to antagonize a large percentage of the state's population.

The State legislature represents a populace that has elected exactly (1) current black House member.

So the likelihood of them sending lame duck Governor Nimarata Randhawa the adulteress slut a bill to remove the flag is not likely.

80 posted on 06/22/2015 4:55:11 PM PDT by Rome2000 (SMASH THE CPUSA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

To: sargon

No flaming here. I’ve evolved on this subject myself. The Confederacy ceased existence 150 years ago, but some people just can’t seem to want to let it go.


98 posted on 06/22/2015 5:35:35 PM PDT by bigdaddy45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

To: sargon
I agree with the governor's decision. There's no reason to display the confederate battle flag on state property if it's going to antagonize a large percentage of the state's population.

And this is going to solve an actual problem of some sort? It's going to cause fathers to feed and care for their bastard children? It's going to reduce crime? It's going to bring solvency to the budget?

What good thing is this going to do other than make silly people feel good about bashing their pet scapegoat?

Part of Liberalism's methodology is making silly things the focus of our attention. This is but the latest silly thing that is sucking all the oxygen out of the room at the expense of more consequential issues.

A couple of weeks ago, it was Bruce Jenner.

107 posted on 06/22/2015 6:17:14 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

To: sargon
Something tells me that the Battle Flag of the Confederacy will still enjoy plenty of expression throughout the state, wherever private citizens, businesses, societies, museums, memorials, etc. think it is appropriate.

Except that they not go out of doors, nor use the public sidewalks and streets, or go into any public place?

Do you realize the logic of your position, that it constitutes a ban on some people's political and First Amendment rights?

You ready to give up your rights? I'm not done with mine.

138 posted on 06/22/2015 9:14:36 PM PDT by lentulusgracchus ("If America was a house , the Left would root for the termites." - Greg Gutfeld)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson