FWIW, 18 months before the 2000 election, Libbey Dole was the top ranked republican in the race.
WHY!?
Does anybody anywhere believe this poll? Although unintentional, it must be satire.
Well then, we have settled science regarding the GOP candidate.
It’s good to have this behind us so we can focus on Rachel Dolezal and Caitlyn Jenner. We also need to resolve the high school lunch menus for this fall with Michelle Obama (after she gets back from Europe).
I’d say 12-15% of republicans will stay home if Jeb is the nominee.
Sure. 75% of Republicans want to abandon the rule of law and give the country to fraudulently documented foreigners.
Maybe they didn’t ask it that way, but they should have because that’s the consequence of voting for Jebster.
Didn’t poll me?
This poll was Conducted under the supervision of Brian Williams. /s
Note to WSJ/NBC
No F%&*-# way!
I don’t believe the poll. Put idealogy aside ... most people vote for President based on some connection, charisma, likability, whatever you want to call it. There is no way Jeb Bush connects with anyone. He is dull and lifeless. He doesn’t have the personality that allowed his brother Dubya to be elected twice.
I’ll vote for someone conservative. Not a bush.
Fk him and a slew of nasty pejoratives I would use to describe him.
By the beard of Zuess, if he becomes the nominee, I will sit home or go on vacation....
Personally, I will NOT vote for Jeb Bush as Dogcatcher even IF we were overrun with Chihuahuas.
Apparently the 75% were obviously drunk. That’s their excuse and they are standing by it...just a bit wobbly.
Count me among the 25% who can’t support him.
Tell a lie and tell it often and soon the lie will be accepted as the truth.
Jeb may be the only person in America guaranteed to lose against Hillary.
It just happens that the WSJ backs Jeb’s amnesty plan, right?
I just wanted to share a little AP story with you that will show their PC/leftist media bias. Read and decide for yourself.
Wash. Times, June 22, 2015, Metro Section: “Police probe sex assaults on 6-year-old girls in stores”
“Prince George’s County Police are investigating whether two separate attacks on 6-year-old girls in the area are related.
Details of the attacks inside a women’s restroom and in a CVS aisle
Then:
“Police describe the suspect as a 25-to-30-year-old man who is 5 foot 8 inches tall. Police say the man was last seen wearing a black-T-shirt with a Nike “swoosh” logo, a black hat and black sneakers”.”
[end of story]
Okay, who are we looking for? An Amish man; a Sikh, an Orthodox Jew, a Mexican-American, a Cuba, a college professor?
Being PG County, I think you can count out the Amish and Jew.
Other lead story you’ve got to read at the Washington Times, by Rowan Scarborough, is “Pentagon categorizes journalists with enemy belligerents: New war manual listing called ‘odd’”.
Key paragraph:
“The manual pushes aside the George W. Bush-era label of ‘unlawful combatant’ for al Qaeda and the like. THE NEW TERM OF CHOICE: ‘UNPRIVILEGED BELLIGERENT’”.
Okay to hurl.
In the method of wordsmith Mark Steyn, if they are “unprivileged belligerents”, how can we make them “privileged belligerents”? And what “privileges” do afford them while they are trying to kill us and our allies?
Do they get Same-Day Voter Registration, an EBT card for food, an Obamaphone, Food Stamps, a Drivers License, free Ammo, an explosives buying permit, free knife sharpening, and lots of orange jump suits for their prisoners?
If you don’t think that the U.S. Military hasn’t been totally coopted, corrupted, and emasculated, then read the full article and weep for America.
As Obama said, “Yes I DID”! PERIOD!
Can any one believe or trust NBC, the home of Brian Williams!!!
Really, these dumb polls are all rigged.