[BlueDragon]

Thanks for the reply, and the link.

The "next story headline and sub-heading there;

Twin Peaks – lawyer calls Waco police liars

“I was lied to by the Waco Police.” – F. Clinton Broden, defense attorney

What the lying was about, among other things, was nothing less than Waco police shooting people.

And that wasn't the only thing they lied about, either --- that so far we know about.

When lies told by police-- make it into court -- then what?

[House Atreides]

“....“The Waco police seem unwilling or unable to tell the public the truth, which is why the Department of Justice must intervene in this case,” said F. Clinton Broden, a Dallas attorney who is representing Matthew Clendennen....”
*****************************************************************************************************
Thanks for the link. The only problem with “the Department of Justice must intervene in this case” is that portions (e.g., agencies such as BATF and high-level Obama political appointees) of Obama’s DOJ could well be part of an ongoing criminal enterprise (of which this Waco incident could be an element) meant to advance the Obama regime’s agenda.

[TexasGator]

“What the lying was about,”

He hints that he was lied to about the cell phone but like a ‘good’ lawyer he is not specific but is good for click-bait.

[TexasGator]

The lawyer:

---

United States Supreme Court decided the case of Ybarra v. Illiinois (click highlighted phrase to read the case) more than thirty-five years ago. Apparently, Waco and McLennan County have still not gotten the message.”

---

Not relevant. This was about a drug case where a person was searched not IAW the search warrant.

Seizing a cell phone at the scene of a multiple homicide as evidence is a whole different issue.