Donald Trump names his favorite prez: Bill Clinton

Politico ^ | 17 JUN 2015 | ADAM B. LERNER

[South40]

Donald Trump may be a Republican, but his favorite president of the last four is none other than Bill Clinton.

“There was a little spirit,” Trump said in an interview set to air on MSNBC’s Morning Joe Thursday. “Frankly, had he not met Monica, had he not met Paula, had he not met various and sundry semi-beautiful women, he would have had a much better deal going.”

[Cboldt]

-- And? So does any man who isn't a queer. --

Point taken, although many (I'd like to say "most," but these days, anything goes) limit their advances to taking an eyeful.

[CatherineofAragon]

"Keep your eye on the eight ball-Who will support the TPA/TPP handiwork in the recent house vote now headed for the senate? Interesting that this trade bill devastating to an independent USA is passing amid the shooting chaos in SC."

You need some clarity on TPA (and it is not TPP). Here...post #15. Very clear and easy to read:

Email From Tret Gowdy

[South40]

When the Donald first announced his candidacy there was a rash of followers who fawned all over the threads with such accolades. That was before the wealth of information was made available revealing what a far-left liberal kook he is. The Donald faithful tried hard to defend him, some anyway, some have completely ignored his liberal past. Example: I have asked several to comment on his saying he supported the assault weapons ban. 4 of 5 completely ignored my requests; they just would not respond. I have never seen FReepers act this way in the defense of any candidate, certainly not one as clearly liberal as Donald Trump. It truly was/is mind boggling.

Sadly, I have someone here who I have always considered a friend. We have been allies on many threads. That "friend" rebuffed my attempts to maintain our friendship and chose the Donald over me. Oh well. What on earth do these people see in a this liberal snakeoil salesman? I'm a fairly educated man but I must admit, I just don't get it.

[NELSON111]

He won't win the GOP nomination...and he will then run and an (I) and throw the election to Hillary...which is why he is running in the first place.

Mark my words...

[CatherineofAragon]

"Point taken, although many (I'd like to say "most," but these days, anything goes) limit their advances to taking an eyeful."

You don't think Clinton the serial adulterer and rapist should have "limited his advances?"

As for Trump, sorry, I don't give the old lech points because his wallet will buy him women.

[BillyBoy]

>> Lincoln the constitution shredding, destroyer of the Republic and defacto dictator shouldn’t be on it. <<

Unfortunately for you, there's unlikely to be a neo-confederate nominated for President anytime soon.

[South40]

You may be right. Will his supporters here at FR think he is Mr. Wonderful then?

He refused to agree with Hannity that Hillary was corrupt and now he says Bill is his fave. He's up to something and it includes the Clintons.

[Cboldt]

-- You don't think Clinton the serial adulterer and rapist should have "limited his advances?" --

I think he should have limited his advances.

-- As for Trump, sorry, I don't give the old lech points because his wallet will buy him women. --

Neither do I. My original point was generally that Clinton and Trump are two peas in a pod, two rotten peas when it comes toward their fidelity and respect for women. I'm not surprised that Trump favors Clinton.

[SoConPubbie]

You need some clarity on TPA (and it is not TPP). Here...post #15. Very clear and easy to read:

Here is an upgraded link that takes you directly to that post:

Email From Tret Gowdy

[SoConPubbie]

You need some clarity on TPA (and it is not TPP). Here...post #15. Very clear and easy to read:

Email From Tret Gowdy

Hey Magna Carta, I'd be real interested in what you think about Representative Gowdy's email after you have had the time to read it.

[SoConPubbie]

BTW Catherine,

That is one awesome, simple explanation of TPA and WHY it is needed.

Good job!

[CatherineofAragon]

I’m sorry about your friend.

None of this makes any sense, unless it’s simply a fact that some conservatives are gullible and easily suckered. I don’t want to admit that to myself, but what else could it be? I would love another explanation.

Since Trump announced, my attempts to uncover his liberal nature have met with the same response as yours. Most of his supporters just don’t want to hear the truth about him.

The sad thing is, Trump is laughing behind his back at them.

[CatherineofAragon]

Thanks rightfully go to libbylu. I’m really glad I happened upon her post. :)

[CatherineofAragon]

Thanks for the upgrade (dang it, I didn’t catch my misspelling).

[GeronL]

“”Donald Trump may be a Republican,””

We don’t really have conclusive proof of this

[South40]

I’m sorry about your friend.

Thanks. It's kinda sad, really. I threw out an olive branch and it was promptly rejected. Over the likes of Donald Trump? Sad and weird.

[NaturalScience]

"Pretty good list except that Lincoln the constitution shredding, destroyer of the Republic and defacto dictator shouldn’t be on it."

Thank you! History goes to the victor, right?

By the way, who else on here can say they voted for Thomas Jefferson? (I wrote him in instead of Romney).

Top 3: Jefferson, Washington, Reagan

[Darren McCarty]

He donated to Hillary.

[South40]

We don’t really have conclusive proof of this

No, we don't. But we have ample proof, in the form of his own words, that he is a democRAT.

[South40]

Six figures. Most any Trump supporter would be highly critical of anyone else should they donate to the Clinton Foundation. But Trump does it and that's somehow ok.

Trump donations to Clinton Foundation add to gun owner concerns