Ted Cruz Ping! If you want on/off this ping list, please let me know.
Please beware, this is a high-volume ping list!
CRUZ or LOSE!
Posted on 06/13/2015 4:07:12 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Senator Cruz entirely understands the widespread suspicion of the President. Nobody has been more vocal in pointing out the President’s lawlessness or more passionate about fighting his usurpation of congressional authority.
Senator Cruz would not and will not give President Obama one more inch of unrestricted power.
There have been a lot of questions and concerns about the ongoing Pacific trade negotiations. Many of those concerns, fueled by the media, stem from confusion about Trade Promotion Authority (TPA) and the proposed Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP). Let’s unpack the issues one by one.
What are TPA and TPP?
TPA stands for Trade Promotion Authority, also known as “fast track”. TPA is a process by which trade agreements are approved by Congress. Through TPA, Congress sets out up-front objectives for the Executive branch to achieve in free trade negotiations; in exchange for following those objectives, Congress agrees to hold an up-or-down vote on trade agreements without amendments. For the past 80 years, it has proven virtually impossible to negotiate free-trade agreements without the fast-track process.
TPP stands for Trans-Pacific Partnership. TPP is a specific trade agreement currently being negotiated by the United States and 11 other countries, including Canada, Japan, Australia, and New Zealand. China is not a negotiating partner. There is no final language on TPP because negotiations are still ongoing and have been since late 2009. Neither the Senate nor the House has voted yet on the TPP. There will be no vote on TPP until the negotiations are over and the final agreement is sent to Congress.
Some Key Facts:
•Neither the Senate nor the House has voted yet on the TPP. •Congress is the only entity that can make U.S. law and nothing about TPP or TPA could change that. •TPA gives the Congress more control up-front over free trade agreements. •TPA mandates transparency by requiring all trade agreements (including TPP) to be made public for at least 60 days before the Congress can act on them.
Does TPA give up the Senate’s treaty power?
No. Under the Constitution, there are two ways to make binding law: (1) through a treaty, ratified by two-thirds of the Senate, or (2) through legislation passed by a majority of both Houses of Congress. TPA employs the second constitutional path, as trade bills always have done. It has long been recognized that the Constitution’s Origination Clause applies to trade bills, requiring the House of Representatives’ involvement.
Does the United States give up Sovereignty by entering into TPP?
No. Nothing in the agreement forces Congress to change any law. TPA explicitly provides that nothing in any trade agreement can change U.S. law. Congress is the only entity that can make U.S. law, and Congress is the only entity that can change U.S. law. Nothing about TPP or TPA could change that.
Does Senator Ted Cruz support TPP?
Senator Cruz has not taken a position either in favor or against TPP. He will wait until the agreement is finalized and he has a chance to study it carefully to ensure that the agreement will open more markets to American-made products, create jobs, and grow our economy. Senator Cruz has dedicated his professional career to defending U.S. sovereignty and the U.S. Constitution. He will not support any trade agreement that would diminish or undermine either.
Does Senator Ted Cruz support TPA?
Yes. Senator Cruz voted in favor of TPA earlier this year because it breaks the logjam that is preventing the U.S. from entering into trade deals that are good for American workers, American businesses, and our economy. Ronald Reagan emphatically supported free trade, and Senator Cruz does as well. He ran for Senate promising to support free trade, and he is honoring that commitment to the voters.
Free trade helps American farmers, ranchers, and manufacturers; indeed, one in five American jobs depends on trade, in Texas alone 3 million jobs depend on trade. When we open up foreign markets, we create American jobs.
TPA also strengthens Congress’ hand in trade negotiations, and provides transparency by making the agreement (including TPP) public for at least 60 days before the Congress can act on any final agreement. Without TPA, there is no such transparency, and the Congress’ role in trade agreements is weaker.
Is TPA Constitutional?
TPA and similar trade authority has been upheld by the Supreme Court as constitutional for more than 100 years.
Does TPA give the President more authority?
No. TPA ensures that Congress has the ability to set the objectives up-front for free trade agreements.
Trade Promotion Authority has been used to reduce trade barriers since FDR. When Harry Reid took over the Senate, he killed it. History demonstrates that it is almost impossible to negotiate a free-trade agreement without TPA. Right now without TPA, America is unable to negotiate free-trade agreements, putting the United States at a disadvantage to China, which is taking the lead world-wide. It is not in America’s interests to have China writing the rules of international trade.
Moreover, Obama is going to be president for just 18 more months. TPA is six-year legislation. If we want the next president (hopefully a Republican) to be able to negotiate free-trade agreements to restart our economy and create jobs here at home then we must reinstate TPA. With a Republican president in office, Senate Democrats would almost certainly vote party-line to block TPA, so now is the only realistic chance.
How can Senator Cruz trust Obama?
He doesn’t. Not at all. No part of Senator Cruz’s support for TPA was based on trusting Obama. However, under TPA, every trade deal is still subject to approval by Congress. If the Obama Administration tries to do something terrible in a trade agreement, Congress can vote it down. And most congressional Democrats will always vote no—because union bosses oppose free trade, so do most Democrats—which means a handful of conservative congressional Republicans have the votes to kill any bad deal. That’s a serious check on presidential power.
Isn’t TPP a “living agreement”?
That particular phrase—a foolish and misleading way to put it—is found in the “summary” portion of one particular section of the draft agreement. That section allows member nations to amend the agreement in the future, expressly subject to the approval of their governments. Thus, if some amendment were proposed in the future, Congress would have to approve it before it went into effect.
But isn’t TPA a secret agreement?
No, it is not. The full text of TPA (fast track) is public. What the Senate just voted for was TPA, not TPP.
Right now, the text of TPP is classified. That is a mistake. Senator Cruz has vigorously called on the Obama administration to make the full text of TPP open to the public immediately. The text being hidden naturally only fuels concerns about what might be in it. Senator Cruz has read the current draft of TPP, and it should be made public now.
Critically, under TPA, TPP cannot be voted on until after the text has been public for 60 days. Therefore, everyone will be able to read it long before it comes up for a vote.
Couldn’t Obama use a trade agreement to grant amnesty to illegal immigrants?
No. There is one section of TPP that concerns immigration, but it affects only foreign nations—the United States has explicitly declined to sign on to that section.
Moreover, Senator Cruz introduced a TPA amendment to expressly prohibit any trade deal from attempting to alter our immigration laws.
Two Republican Senators (Lindsey Graham and Rand Paul) blocked the Senate’s consideration of that amendment, but the House of Representatives has agreed to include that language in the final text of the trade legislation. Thus, assuming the House honors that public commitment, federal law will explicitly prohibit any trade deal from impacting immigration.
And, regardless, no trade agreement can change U.S. law; only Congress can change U.S. law.
Cruz doesn't control transparency on TPP Jane....what he can do is set the stage for the long run on TPP which will not go in effect until the next Presidency....and Cruz knows the next President needs to hit the ground running on this.....passing it now gives our guys room to set the parameters on trade before hand and be ready to go.....this is why Pelosi fought against Obama.....they see the handwriting on the wall and aren't about to give any Republican President Administration an inch. Both sides of TPP are deciding according to the next election regarding TPP..not under Obama.....
Cruz doesn't control transparency on TPP Jane....what he can do is set the stage for the long run on TPP which will not go in effect until the next Presidency....and Cruz knows the next President needs to hit the ground running on this.....passing it now gives our guys room to set the parameters on trade before hand and be ready to go.....this is why Pelosi fought against Obama.....they see the handwriting on the wall and aren't about to give any Republican President Administration an inch. Both sides of TPP are deciding according to the next election regarding TPP..not under Obama.....
Thanks. I know plenty about the candidates I listed. I simply corrected the mistaken statement that they were (all) for it.
There are respectable and honorable people on both sides of this debate.
Referring to those who disagree with you as approaching Alinsky, BSers etc is a race to the bottom.
Sorry, I don’t find Cruz’s behavior here honorable. It certainly is not honorable to tell these half truths like this is some high school debate club meeting. This is a serious matter and it deeply troubles me that Cruz is telling lies by omission.
I’m also disappointed in the tactics (name calling, profanity) being used towards those who are not in support of TPP/Cruz’ support of TPP. That shouldn’t be happening, on EITHER side. We should agree to disagree...with the debate and with the facts.
I agree. That’s why it so disappointing to see press releases like this.
It’s like the Cruz campaign thinks we can’t gather our own facts and need to be spoon fed. It’s all ham handed and not winning friends.
Rubio’s campaign has been much more nimble getting his message out while under attack. Cruz doesn’t seem to be able do that on this issue for whatever reason.
Then one of you please answer my questions. Thanks.
I support free trade but I do not trust any legislation as large as this one that is done in secret.
Like I’ve recently said...it’s like upside-down world, here. This all-in-regardless and supporting ANYTHING that give 0blama ANY power...with blind support, is simply amazing. If Cruz were against it, you’d see a whole different tone going on, here. Strange.
Agree!
Truly bizarro world!
Thanks very much for answering. I will study it.
‘Pod.
Roger that.
I’ll also toss this your way, an article with some background info on trade agreements and how they differ from treaties in the way they’re passed which I found very clarifying:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3300062/posts
Who died and put you in charge?
Agree, I am pretty shocked at Cruz statements and behavior.
I really don’t see Cruz recovering from his error. I see his vote splintering among Paul, Santorum, and maybe Trump.
Last week I told my daughter Cruz was my candidate for POTUS... She asked me why and my main line of support was he supported truth, daylight on Govt, opposing Obama in ALL he wants and desires. Then we come to this and it looks like McConell-Boehner redux a la Cruz! Devastating!
If Cruz is elected president, McConnell and Boehner are not likely to continue in their leadership posts.
Ted Cruz Ping! I can only pray that this would be true.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.