Anyone who objected to having Jerusalem, Israel as their place of birth on their US passport was given the choice to have their place of birth printed as Jerusalem on their US passport. Of course, the statist won’t stand for it. Choices lead to personal liberty and the statist would rather sue than allow that. Some US citizens will make their choices to make a public statement with their choice based on their First Amendment right to free speech. The statist will take to the Supreme Court to stop it.
You’ve been browbeat into submission. Free yourself and demand personal liberty.
It’s not a free speech issue at all. A passport is a legal document, expected to be honored everywhere in the world. Circumspection is called for
Obama’s idiocy aside, the courts have since the founding granted the president broad powers in foreign relations, as that was one of the few proper powers assigned to the Executive Branch.
I demand personal liberty. I was born in California, I'm a proud member of La Raza, and I demand the right to have "Los Angeles, Mexico" listed on my passport.
Thank you for your support on this.
I don't know which hypothetical situation you're describing here, but this sure doesn't describe the U.S. Supreme Court case at hand. In this case, the "statists" were the defendants and never filed a lawsuit.