I’m not so sure I can agree with the premise. Fracking is very popular here in blue Pennsylvania. If you want to see Pennsylvania vote red in the next presidential election, let the Dem candidate come out against fracking.
Good comment.
The writer either avoided Pennsylvania because he believed it would slip by unnoticed (as it ruins the liberal line) or he didn’t do his homework.
Yet, in their ongoing campaign to sway weak minded voters, the media will do its best to shout down debate and paint voices in opposition to “green” concerns as extreme, anti-science ravings.
Hopefully, reason will prevail as people realize that the economy is being suppressed. “Green” issues do not chart high on voters’ concerns.
It is regional in PA. “The T” is quite red.
PA may have voted rat for President since 1992 but it is best described as a swing state.
As an aside, “red” means commie in my book, these media colors annoy me.
Pennsylvania is in Republican control (lousy Republicans) but for the Governor who won be default as the last Republican increased fuel taxes by 28 cents per gallon and failed to privatize our state liquor store system.
Pennsylvania votes Dem for national elections based on the 105% fabricated vote coming out of mostly Philadelphia.
Statewide elections in non-Presidential years tend to go Republican.
It is a great example of liberal fraud.
I lived in NY State until after I retired; the difference between blue NY and the PA countryside is like night and day. But that doesn't mean that the least aware voters here are any smarter than the least aware voters in NY.There are gullible voters concentrated in every major city. People who are easily swindled into voting for shadenfreude even when their own best interests are actually damaged by it.