Posted on 06/02/2015 7:31:47 PM PDT by Dave346
State Department spokesperson Marie Harf said she was “perplexed” by a New York Times story Tuesday on Iran’s 20 percent increase in nuclear fuel over the past 18 months.
The United States has been in negotiations with Iran for a final deal about their nuclear program. The International Atomic Energy Agency issued a report on Friday that documented an increase of Iran’s nuclear fuel stockpile.
A reporter asked Harf if Iran’s increased stockpiles has complicated the current negotiations.
“Not at all. Our team read that story this morning and was quite frankly perplexed because the main contentions of it are totally inaccurate,” Harf said.
Harf explained why she felt that way.
“First, the notion in the story that western officials or U.S. officials involved were unaware of this issue or not understanding of what this entails is just absurd,” Harf said. “Under the JPOA (Joint Plan of Action), Iran can fluctuate its numbers in terms of their stockpile. They can go up and down as long as at the end of fixed date they are back down below a number.”
Iran’s increase in its nuclear stockpile during the negotiations goes against what White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest said during a White House briefing on March 2.
“So what we also know is that Iran has decided to engage in a set of serious negotiations, that previously Iran had just used diplomatic negotiations as cover to try to make progress on their nuclear program,” Earnest said. “But in the context of these talks, we’ve actually succeeded in not just halting Iran’s progress as it relates to their nuclear program but actually rolling it back in several key areas, including reducing and eliminating their stockpile of highly enriched uranium. So I think the evidence indicates that this sanctions regime has been effective.”
Harf said that this is not a concern because Iran agreed to reduce their stockpile when the agreement gets implemented.
“What matters is that they [Iran] have committed already, and we said publicly to reducing their stockpile whenever this implemented 300 kilograms,” Harf said. “The notion that this is some big issue of concern of negotiation is more manufacturing a controversy than actual reality. Everyone who read that story this morning was totally perplexed by it.”
The Institute for Science and International Security analyzed the question of whether Iran could meet its obligations regarding 5 percent low enriched uranium, and authors David Albright and Serene Kelleher-Vergantini assessed that “Iran has fallen behind in its pledge to convert its newly produced LEU hexafluoride into oxide form. There are legitimate questions about whether Iran can produce all the requisite LEU oxide … By the end of June, in order to meet its commitment under the JPA, Iran must finish converting the 2,720 kg of LEU into oxide and introduce into the EUPP and convert into oxide, 1,106 kg of 3.5 percent LEU hexafluoride produced over the last several months (plus the few hundred kilograms of LEU to be produced in late May and June 2015). Thus, Iran has clearly fallen behind in its pledge under the JPA.”
Sounds right. Harf is perplexed. Barry and Valerie aren’t.
She will be working in the White House for President Hillary.
I've seen bowls of spinach with more brains than she has.
Perplexing indeed for all spokeswomen for the State Department who wear hipster glasses and sport blond hair.
“It’s a strange sticky wicket this ‘increase of stockpile’, it just doesn’t make any sense. The Iranians have told us they are working towards reducing it, they told us. It’s almost like they are lying, but that can’t be true...
“I’ll have to get back to you on that.” Which is spokesperson speak for “I’m gonna just ignore this issue and hope you forget to ask about it in the future.”
It’s quite reassuring to know our national security is in such capable hands.
If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
..................
Related threads
Surprise: Iran’s supply of enriched uranium has grown 20% despite Obama's claim it was “frozen”
Perplexed. I'll accept that, unlike her bosses, Kerry and Obama, who lie. Or is she simply perplexed the NYT got the story. Or couldn't be persuaded not to print.
Exactly! Truth is always subject to liberal interpretation.
the point of the issue is that the STATE DEPARTMENT has no knowledge or CONTROL over what Iran is doing and the increased amount of fissionable material shows Iran has supplies, sources or own manufacturing capability that the STATE DEPT in all its NUANCED DIVINE WISDOM... they are soooooosmart you know..KNOWS NOTHING ABOUT AND HAS NOT INCLUDED IN THE TALKS... ALLOWING IRAN TO CIRCUMVENT THE ENTIRE DEAL.... Perhaps in their divine wisdom they DONT ACCOUNT FOR RUSSIAN OR PAKI SUPPLIES..??????? and THEY DONT KNOW WHERE OR THE SIZE OF ALL THE CENTRIFUGES ...AND THUS HAVE NO WAY OF LIMITING IRAN.... BUT THEY WILL FORCE A TREATY ANYHOW....... ITS OBAMA’S LEGACY.... yes you will recall his “legacy” right after the first iranian nuke goes off in the ussa
OK. That made me laugh out loud at work.
And then a few minutes later when I thought about it again.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.