Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: G Larry

Geesh....then according to you and your claim that real-time collection is needed would mean that your carrier shouldn’t even be able to print out that detailed billing they send you each month on your cell phone, huh?

Secondly, blanket collection of data from private citizens who have NOT been shown to be criminal and that does not carry the benefit of sworn warrant is against the intent of the 4th Amendment.

This government lies about what it does, DNIC Clapper lied to Congress and had to retract it. Hide behind all the good intentions and honor you think these people have along with the likes of Lois Lerner, Holder and DoJ, Koskinen and all the rest of them. It still won’t change what they are.

Your understanding seems clouded to me. You still believe they are trying to protect us from terrorists even though they won’t even use the word.


66 posted on 06/02/2015 5:26:48 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]


To: Gaffer

It is NOT “collection of content”!!!

The USSC has already ruled that Meta Data collection is NOT protected under the 4th Amendment.


70 posted on 06/02/2015 7:38:03 AM PDT by G Larry (Obama Hates America, Israel, Capitalism, Freedom, and Christianity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson