Only one dead? Somebody needs more time on the range.
practice practice practice
and yep we need more of this
let them wonder who is packing heat and will fight back
better yet go get a job and earn your own dang money
Might have had furniture in his way. His little buddy was busy handing money over, so he might have been an obstruction. He hit all three, so he ‘made the tools work for him’. Wonder what tool was his choice for carry?
Been in a lot of firefights, tough guy?
Those range targets don’t shoot back, this guy had balls and hit all three.
There’s still hope for the one critical...
“Only one dead? Somebody needs more time on the range.”
I dead easy money thug, 1 critical homey, 1 wounded cretin?
Perfectly acceptable.
One dead, two wounded (one critically), is a pretty damn good count.
One against three? Dirty Harry would be proud.
By the way, there is a big difference in firing at a stationary range target than a live confrontation with a hostile. Kudos to the shooter!
It’s not like the movies.
After the first shot the other two probably scattered like cockroaches when the lights come on. A moving target IS harder to hit. Plus he may have lost time by not using point shooting techniques.
‘”Only one dead? Somebody needs more time on the range”.
I don’t know about that. It seems to me that 3 for 3 ain’t so bad.
“Only one dead? Somebody needs more time on the range.”
Six in a crowded area and he got the three bad guys with no others injured.
Adrenalin is flowing with a gun pointed at you.
I have no complaints about his shooting.
“Only one dead? Somebody needs more time on the range.”
Hell, he hit all three (one dead & one critical) without hitting his buddies AND prevented the armed robber from shooting anyone. I’d say that’s remarkable shooting under the circumstances.
He hit all three bad guys. I’d say he did quite well. The object is not to kill the bad guy, it is to stop the threat. He did that. Kudos to him and his shooting ability.