[musicman]

Help FR Continue the Conservative Fight!
Your Monthly and Quarterly Donations
Help Keep FR In the Battle!

Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!

[gov_bean_ counter]

"Our strategy is to support the Iraqi security forces in doing what we will not do for them,"

Say what???

[bgill]

The WH doesn’t know the meaning of security.

[Oliviaforever]

First, Obama perpetuates a war in Iraq and now is turning his back on the people of Iraq in order to satisfy the anti war crowd.

[molson209]

White House: Obama won’t be ‘responsible’ for ‘security situation’ in the United States

[servantboy777]

>>The United States is not going to be responsible for securing the security situation inside of Iraq,”<<

Oh contraire Obozo. Just wait till these ISIS psycho muzzies take over complete countries. All their oil, gold, weapons (to include chemical/biological).

WWIII is a comin and it ain’t gonna be pretty.

[RightGeek]

[onedoug]

April 1975: US won't be 'responsible' for 'security situation' in South Vietnam

Deja vu all over again.

[tcrlaf]

“the White House was putting clear limits on the lengths to which the U.S. will go to reverse ISIS’ gains,”

Who says the muzzies in the White House want ISIS to stop gaing??

[Jim Robinson]

Obama = epic fail.

[Cboldt]

Telegraphing the expected outcome. If the clown-in-chief thought ISIS/ISIL whatever would be defeated, he’d have his press flack up there taking credit, not disclaiming responsibility.

[PrairieDawg]

White House: US won't be 'responsible' for 'security situation' in Iraq

Fixed it!

[TADSLOS]

“We’re Not Responsible- Ever”(unless it enhances the slave plantation), said every democrat everywhere.

[SandRat]

But Butt-Head Barrack is.

[a fool in paradise]

Not even with the Obama administration supporting the Muslim Brotherhood and arming Islamic State in Syria???

[RC one]

We will have to deal with the conesquences of our failures however.

[grania]

Gosh, very few people want US troops in other countries especially when our own isn't being protected from invasion. But we created the problem....there's now a void where heavy-handed leaders kept control, and US policy filled that void by arming, training, financing, and now refusing to disintegrate the maniacs who filled it.

I really fear ISIS tactics could go global this summer.

[Attention Surplus Disorder]

The only “security” this WH knows is the security of knowing that you’ll be chucked under the bus the minute they believe you’re surplus to their needs.

[EternalVigilance]

When Obama debated Alan Keyes in the IL Senate race in 2004 on foreign policy, he spoke glowingly of “soft power.” Keyes, knowing something about the subject, having been part of the Reagan team that ultimately brought down the Soviet Union, scoffed, and said that you can’t meet a hard threat with soft power. He rightly pointed out that that’s like trying to take on a bayonet with a wet spaghetti noodle.

Well, here’s some more of the fruit of the bad decision the people of Illinois, and ultimately the people of the United States, made.

Strength, wisely applied, breeds peace.

“Soft power,” especially in the hands of idiots, breeds war, destruction, and tyranny.

[CivilWarBrewing]

0dumbo has sabotaged America’s foreign policy to the point where I don’t think we can recover. Any country who trusts the United States is sure to get SCREWED by the United States. If I were an Iraqi I would bitterly hate 0dumbo for turning his back on Bush’s commitment to Iraq.