Posted on 05/27/2015 4:03:56 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
Is one quarter accurate. Or is that a Net Present Value of Mexicans by today’s population figures?
If you look at the number of Mexicans in Mexico in 1980.
Steve King was apparently misogynist when he grabbed the tattooed Dreamer thug’s hand and told her to stop importing lawlessnessness.
It was ironic because her deadbeat misogynist Mexican father who beat her mother was the reason she claims she and her mother were in America.
Ramos made an emphatic point about percentages and numbers. He had the percentage right and eventually got the numbers right.. 40 million.
But he seemed to brush off the point.. percentages and numbers alone do not matter -- it is culture, heritage, and language. Prior to the past few decades we could count on immigrants with knowledge of at least two of the three.
That lack could be made up with the willingness to learn and adopt. But is it there? Or do way too many cling to the mores and languages of their corrupt homeland? Especially Mexicorruption.
At least the percentages and numbers are there in federal stats.
http://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/infographics/foreign_born_text.pdf
America's Foreign Born in the Last 50 Years During the last 50 years, the foreign - born population of the United States has undergone dramatic changes in size, origins, and geographic distributions. This population represented about 1 in 20 residents in 1960, mostly from countries in Europe who settled in the Northeast and Midwest. Todays foreign - born population makes up about one in eight U.S. residents, mostly immigrants from Latin America and Asia who have settled in the West and South. The Decennial Census and the annual American Community Survey allow us to trace the changes in the foreign - born population over time.
Decade | Millions | Percentage | Europe | N America | Latin America | Asia | Other |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1850 | 2.2 | 9.7 % | - | - | - | - | - |
1860 | 4.1 | 13.2 % | - | - | - | - | - |
1870 | 5.6 | 14.4 % | - | - | - | - | - |
1880 | 6.7 | 13.3 % | - | - | - | - | - |
1890 | 9.2 | 14.8 % | - | - | - | - | - |
1900 | 10.3 | 13.6 % | - | - | - | - | - |
1910 | 13.5 | 14.7 % | - | - | - | - | - |
1920 | 13.9 | 13.2 % | - | - | - | - | - |
1930 | 14.2 | 11.6 % | - | - | - | - | - |
1940 | 11.6 | 8.8 % | - | - | - | - | - |
1950 | 10.3 | 6.9 % | - | - | - | - | - |
1960 | 9.7 | 5.4 % | 75 % | 10 % | 9 % | 5 % | 1 % |
1970 | 9.6 | 4.7 % | - | - | - | - | - |
1980 | 14.1 | 6.2 % | - | - | - | - | - |
1990 | 19.8 | 7.9 % | - | - | - | - | - |
2000 | 31.1 | 11.1 % | - | - | - | - | - |
2010 | 40.0 | 12.9 % | 12 % | 2 % | 53 % | 28 % | 5 % |
Huh, Ramos says nothing on Mexico’s strict immigration laws. If Coulter decided to live in Mexico without a passport she’d be kicked out asap.
Good post. Thanks.
America was not founded by wetbacks. The only thing lower
than a wetback is the treasonous criminals that hire them.
That’s if Ann doesn’t get raped or beheaded first.
But yeah, I don’t know why the amnesty shills never talk about Mexico’s immigration policy, which is second only to Japan in strictness.
I'm gratified to see that fewer and fewer are willing to play these stupid gotcha games with the progressive reprobates.
She should have asked him, “Since it seems the majority of Mexican citizens want to live under the American system of government would you be okay with the U.S. conquering Mexico, eliminating the Mexican government, flag, and nationality? Then everyone south of the current border could stay south of the border and still be an American and start paying taxes to the IRS to fund the Social Security for millions of white Americans. You’re good with that, right?”
I thought Ann was pro-amnesty/immigration. Or just pro-Romney. Same thing.
Ann should have said, the hug, if any , comes after legal entry and a long hot shower, and not before!
Hug THIS Bish!
An addendum to my post above:
Ann then should have added:
“And we are going to send you Jeb Bush, Marco Rubio, and all the other open borders politicians to run the place for you. Good luck with the Hondurans and Guatemalans!”
“And oh, by the way, we are also sending down all of our Hollywood and inner-city druggies so instead of shipping the drugs north, they can be right by the supply. It’s all about what best for the marketplace as you say.”
Mexico needs to live with the poverty it creates from it’s corrupt economic/political system and be prevented from using the US as a poverty safety valve.
Imagine a few million young Mexican males agitating for economic change bottled up in their own country.
Ramos was playing a game with the percentages. He said that the percentage 90 years ago is about the same at it is today (it is) and implied that it is some sort of norm. However, as your table shows, this was a high water mark, which caused a substantial reduction of legal immigration with the 1925 Immigration Act. During the period 1920 to 1965, immigration averaged 195,000 a year. It is now 1.1 million a year.
Ann should have called him on it. In 1970 one in 21 was foreign born; today it is one in 8, the highest in 90 years; and within a decade it will be one in 7, the highest in our history. We have just had the two highest decades of immigration in American history. Over 30 million legal permanent immigrants have entered this country since 1990.
We need to reduce legal immigration no matter where the people come from.
Mexico’s unemployment rate is less than ours.
How can they not be 125% over poverty required by law before getting a green card or citizenship? Follow the laws.
Took my wife ( from Mexico) 21 years to get citizenship legally.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.