Skip to comments.
A Singapore Airlines Airbus jet lost power on all of its engines mid-flight (dropped 13,000 feet)
Yahoo ^
| 5/27/15
| Benjamin Zhang
Posted on 05/27/2015 12:46:34 PM PDT by jalisco555
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-72 last
To: knarf
61
posted on
05/27/2015 5:30:22 PM PDT
by
dinodino
To: C210N
"Which is why I always try and make my air travel on single engine airplanes. With two, you are twice as likely to lose an engine. "LOL! Well done.
62
posted on
05/27/2015 6:04:48 PM PDT
by
MV=PY
(The Magic Question: Who's paying for it?)
To: The_Republic_Of_Maine
Yes, but how are their seat cleaning people? Best in the industry, IIRC.
Oh, pardon me. I'm a little slow catching on there.
All departing passengers were issued complimentary "Depends" and a little Pine Tree air freshener to hang on a belt loop.
To: Junk Silver
If it aint Boeing, Im not going!
...
A 777 lost power to both engines while landing in London a few years ago.
64
posted on
05/27/2015 6:29:28 PM PDT
by
Moonman62
(The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
To: Moonman62
I’ll take an engine power loss during landing over one at 39,000 feet any day of the week!
To: central_va
If we lose one more engine, well be up here all day."Glad you posted this, it was my first thought when reading the article.
66
posted on
05/27/2015 8:05:37 PM PDT
by
Dustoff45
(A good woman brings out the best in a good man! A better woman might be just what this nation needs)
To: Junk Silver
I feel safe in saying that 100% of pilots would rather have the engine failure at the higher altitude.
67
posted on
05/27/2015 8:09:49 PM PDT
by
Moonman62
(The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
To: Junk Silver; Moonman62
That’s gonna make them Brake Pads get awful hot before POSSIBLY getting that Bird stopped before being out of Runway.
Reverse Thrust does A LOT of the Braking!
68
posted on
05/28/2015 4:27:38 AM PDT
by
mabarker1
(congress, The Opposite of Progress.)
To: jalisco555
Singapore Airlines Flight 836, flying from Singapore to Shanghai, lost power mid-flight on both of its Rolls-Royce engines.Over Macho Grande?
To: Moonman62
RE: Your Homepage![](http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_pLHvRVB0c10/S7F9jkp8fwI/AAAAAAAAAHw/7E-sMNoI73I/s1600/TheEnd.jpg)
70
posted on
05/28/2015 4:32:29 AM PDT
by
mabarker1
(congress, The Opposite of Progress.)
To: mabarker1
“Reverse Thrust does A LOT of the Braking!”
I suppose this is why the airlines never poll passengers on when they would prefer to have both engines lose power. I can see how having a plane that can’t stop could be problematic in a landing situation.
I’ll still go with Boeing. The French make great pastries but I just don’t trust them to build solid airliners.
To: Junk Silver
If I still flew it would only on a US made Plane.
72
posted on
05/28/2015 8:40:09 AM PDT
by
mabarker1
(congress, The Opposite of Progress.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-72 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson