Posted on 05/27/2015 7:21:16 AM PDT by RightGeek
MIAMI, Florida — Conservative columnist and 10-time New York Times bestselling author Ann Coulter steamrolled Fusion host Jorge Ramos in an appearance Tuesday filled with dramatic moments, none more interesting than where Coulter got Ramos to admit he doesn’t believe there should be a limit to how many Mexicans the United States will allow into this country—either legally or illegally.
[snip]
Ramos followed up by asking Coulter if he thinks America is a “stronger nation” because it’s “more diverse, more tolerant.”
“It’s not more diverse, it’s more Mexican,” Coulter shot back.
“I think it’s more diverse—much more diverse,” Ramos replied.
After Ramos said he thinks “diversity” is “fantastic” and “beautiful,” Coulter wrapped the full segment with a question of her own for him.
“We have taken in one quarter of the entire Mexican population,” Coulter asked him. “At what point will we have taken in enough, in your view?”
That’s where Ramos made his stunning admission.
“I think that with the legal system—“ he started to answer.
“Half the Mexican population? The entire Mexican population?” Coulter kept pressing.
“No, I think with the legal system we wouldn’t need and we wouldn’t be having hundreds of people dying crossing the border,” Ramos replied.
“That isn’t an answer to the question,” Coulter corrected him. “One quarter of the Mexican population. How much more do we have to take?”
Ramos dodged again, essentially admitting he supports no limit whatsoever.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
You could do that I guess. But you’d have to confiscate all the wealth of the elite in Mexico and just make it a state - one more to the fifty. The problem is those elites want their cake and to be able to eat it too.
But fix your own damn country!
Oh great more mouths to feed, house, and give free medical care and educations to. And they don’t even pay taxes to boot. So I guess instead of working 15 hours a week extra to pay the taxes it’ll pribably be ramped up to 20 - 25 hours. Great. Just great.
Even the ROMANS has enough sense to keep the Germans out for centuries, till they simply overwhelmed ROME.
Why stop with Mexicans? There’s 600 million south of the border. Why not bring them all here?
Then we can go there.
Mexico as a state? Are you nuts?
No....it was sarcastic. Elites in Mexico would not let that happen. They don’t want the competition with our own scumbag politicians. They are the reason why things are so terrible that make the masses want to leave.
IMO we would already be justified in confiscating all of their natural resources at this point. How much has been spent on illegal immigrants and their children? Billions obviously. How close are we to a trillion? Our military could wipe out the drug cartels in days, possibly hours if they made an effort of it. They want to take us over, now it is our turn. Enough....
You know- the solution is obvious if anyone had the cohones to do it. They don’t want a border? Fine- NO border-TAKE Mexico-it’s all the U.S.Absorb it. Not just the people-everything. As it is now we’re getting the burden but no benefits. Make it all the U.S. then the natives could stay where they are and our government would have all the control over the minerals, tourism etc that the Mexicans are wasting. Don’t take Mexicans- take Mexico!
I sympathize. But our more recent history shows that we so often get saddled with the dire consequences of victory over our enemies.
Yep. They already have a securable southern border....
Is Obama planning to annex Mexico ? LOL
Well.....maybe there’s an upside to that. Maybe we could just build a transcontinental sewer system to dump all our sh!t there. Also, we could probably build a big highway that we could use to ship all of our trash. Heck....nuclear waste from spent reactor rods, shoot....we could even put up a wall around it and make it a prison....
Impose American law on the separate state and in a generation or two, it would be functional enough that they not only would no longer feel the need to drive out their population, but they would do their own border enforcement against the rest of Mexico and Central America.
For an example of what they could be, look at Belize, which shares a border with both Mexico and Guatemala, our top sources of illegal immigration.
Belize has an English law system, enforces their borders and screens would be immigrants carefully. It has a population density similar to Kansas, only 5% of which is white. Yet, it almost never is in the news because it has a functional economic, political and border enforcement system. The rare times when it is, it is because some internet tycoon is moving there.
If MEHico is so freakin' wornderful, why not leave that crap where it is? America already HAS A COUNTRY and doesn't need any more spicy food or panther piss beer. America won World Wars! We put man on the moon! Without America, the world would still be a bunch of Neanderthals clobbering one another with rubber chickens and beheading innocent people. (Okay! We screwed up the thing in the Mideast). Sorry. Leave MEHico where it is. It's in a good place already.
We are not talking the middle east here, if that is your reference. It would be cheaper to build the infrastructure in Mexico to handle the poor and displaced civilians. As far as the cartels, complete annihilation, genocide if you will of anyone associated with the cartels. Of course, that would be awkward for many in our government who obviously collude with them.....
See my post #15 for a less radical solution.
How many Mexicans will be forced upon us? The answer to that is: However many it takes to force us to cede most of the country’s sovereignty to Mexico. That’s what we should really be discussing, because those who believe that’s not the ultimate goal are deluding themselves.
There has to be a limit because we need to fit in an unlimited amount of moslems too.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.