The suggestion that somehow curtailing consumer choice in the deodorant market would somehow free resources that could be used to feed hungry children is even more illiterate than what usually passes for economic discourse on the left.
Bernie who?
Didn’t his uncle invent fried chicken?
Life is so much better in the socialist utopias of Cuba and Venezuela, where you can buy no brands of deodorant or toilet paper and children are starving.
Oh, my! Is this moron going to license who can make deodorant products and what is in them? What makes him think that if I buy a cheaper deodorant that I will feed a hungry child who is not one of my kids who seem to be able to pack away the chow—at least the teenage boys do. The teenage girls—not so much.
Perhaps Bernie should recognize that whether or not people use deodorant they are responsible first for feeding their children. Only if they cannot do so should their neighbors do so. Only if their neighbors cannot do so, should the city do so. Only if the city cannot do so, should the state do so. Only if the state cannot do so should the federal government do so.
Bernie seems to have that backwards.
Reminds me of an article I read once about a lefty woman who suffered profound guilt while applying her makeup, knowing that there were hungry children in the world, as if one had anything at all to do with the other.
What about tampons and make-up? I heard a long time ago that women spend more on make-up and their hair than the military budget.
In the socialist economy of Bernie, the older, more costly product is the only one available, so people have to wait in lines to simply be able to buy it.
How many should there be? How do you know? Why do you get to be the one who decides how many?
Can someone please explain to me how does one connect smelly armpits to Children Hunger. This dude is or planning to run for president - Lord help us.
With EBT and food banks and free school meals, the reason kids are hungry is Michelle Obama’s nutrition standards in school meals.
We have literally hundreds of programs from the federal, state, county, local government, private institutions and corner churches that can and will feed people...especially children..
The only reason children go hungry is because they have morons for parents or are drug addled, drunk, unfit, mentally ill or a combination of all three...
I'd love to see how much Bernie Sanders has given to the poor and needy....probably zilch...
Are there hungry children in France? I have never been near a French person that didn’t sink.
How nice... children are going hungry? Really, Bernie? There is EBT, school lunches, breakfast and dinner, food banks, churches so you shouldn’t have ANY hungry kids.
If their mothers bought deodorant instead of crystal meth there would be enough money left for food.
Mitchum gel:
Active Ingredients
Aluminum Sesquichlorohydrate - 25%Anti-Perspirant
Inactive Ingredients
Water , Cyclopentasiloxane , Dimethicone , Dipropylene Glycol , Glycerin , Tocopheryl Acetate , Aloe Barbadensis Leaf Extract , PEG 12 Dimethicone Crosspolymer , PEG/PPG 19/19 Dimethicone , PEG/PPG 18/18 Dimethicone , Xylitol , Hydrogen Peroxide , Silica Dimethicone Silylate , Ethylene Brassylate
==
I don’t see how banning such a product will help starving kids. None of the ingredients are worth of a meal.
not a word on the mens hygeine product....... UMPIRE...... for FOUL BALLS
thats sexist bernie....cmon
So, this guy believes that if there was less choice in deodorants, that fewer children would go hungry? How? What sort of logic connects those two items?
He falls into the same category as Hank Johnson.
This is the most retarded straw man argument this week. Is the democrat party running out of methamphetamine and crack cocaine? Or was it the brown acid?