Agreed.
Has anyone heard of the Baccalaureate program in our high schools? It’s a U. N. developed program that (in part) has U. S. students studying history (also) in part from a world view outside the U. S.
Any guesses on whether it’s a positive view of the U. S. as seen through other nations citizen’s eyes?
Part of learning history, is to learn why your own nation did things. You develop a sense of self, how our nation operates, why, and how that impacts the world positively from our point of view.
This process helps to build nationalistic understanding, national pride, nationalistic loyalty.
It’s part of the global plan to show the U. S. in a negative light even to it’s own citizens, so they won’t be as likely to object to globalism.
I think it’s very insidious. We shouldn’t allow it.
The trend is global if the powers that be prevail.
One big mass of workers bees turning out products&profits for multinational conglomerates run by Ivy League egalitarians who could care less about means,, only the ends.. And sure as anything the US will get the butt end. ;-)
UNIVERSITY APPROVES ‘HISTORY’ CLASS THAT DOESN’T MENTION BOTH WORLD WARS
Anthropology class can meet U.S. history grad requirement, prompting debate and concern
Sacramento State University will now allow an anthropology course to fulfill the school’s general education history requirement, a decision that has prompted fierce debate, with history scholars noting it effectively allows students to take a “history” class that doesn’t even mention either World War, among other important topics.
As it stands, the anthropology class will reportedly focus on “the intersection of race, class, gender, ethnicity and sexuality; the political economy of institutions and ideas, such as racism, classism, sexual stereotyping, family, religion, state, color blindness, multiculturalism, etc.; and, discourses of cultural diversity in the U.S.”
http://www.thecollegefix.com/post/22385/