To: SeekAndFind
Sooo. We’re just not supposed to eat?
2 posted on
05/22/2015 8:05:29 AM PDT by
Durbin
To: Durbin
Remember: the ultra-libs want a worldwide population of only 250,000,000. We’re 6.25 BILLION over that mark right now.
What better way to reduce the population than by mass starvation? If it’s not fast enough, just shoot those who refuse to follow the guidelines.
Yes...it’s utter, demonic foolishness.
7 posted on
05/22/2015 8:10:35 AM PDT by
hoagy62
("Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered..."-Thomas Paine. 1776)
To: Durbin
"Sooo. Were just not supposed to eat?"
Progressives have been fantasizing about ways to get rid of 3 or 4 billion people for quite a while, so maybe they'll ban eating one of these days.
To: Durbin
The New York Times wants Americans to eat slime so liberal elites can have MORE ... editors dining at fancy New York Restaurants - totally pigging out while inviting every third world illegal to crash the country.
Yes, they hate us.
It's like forcing the everyday people to adjust to low flush toilets so Michale Moore and his butler (et al) can have larger swimming pools.
These are not nice people.
16 posted on
05/22/2015 8:24:11 AM PDT by
GOPJ
(Did ABC really 'research' the Clinton Cash book and find 'nothing' or was that also lie?)
To: Durbin
17 posted on
05/22/2015 8:30:36 AM PDT by
RushIsMyTeddyBear
(The White House is now known as "Casa Blanca".)
To: Durbin
Eat liberals. Sure they are probably gamey and stringy without much meat. But it’s a twofer. They will be happy and smug knowing they are helping combat climate change and saving the earf while they simmer in a warm pot over a hot fire.
To: Durbin
Goes right along with not breathing because we exhale carbon dioxide.
33 posted on
05/22/2015 9:37:31 AM PDT by
Let's Roll
(Before it can get any better it has to stop getting worse - vote 4 most conservative available)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson