Posted on 05/18/2015 6:52:16 PM PDT by Behind Liberal Lines
After filing a FOIA suit, thanks to a court order Judicial Watch obtained documents from the Department of Defense and Department of State which indicate the Obama administration knew al Qaeda was planning the attack in Benghazi ten days before it happened.
(Excerpt) Read more at legalinsurrection.com ...
So, what was so important that they sent Chris Stephens in, knowing that an attack was coming? (Rhetorical question).
Vast right wing conspiracy.
Barry gave the jihadis buddies of his american sacrifices.
Probably for the fake bin laden killing. Not enough he gave them intel to shoot down the seal chopper.
You know the answer to that. Hillary on behalf of her BFF Morsi sent Amb. Stevens in to be kidnapped so Morsi could offer to exchange him for release of the Blind Sheik from U.S. custody. They didn’t plan on Stevens succumbing to a fire, or locals commandeering their attack.
Post of the day Sir IMHO.
WAIT, wait .... I think the author of the article comes to an incorrect conclusion. From the original papers, it looks as though the WH administration knew (as far as this paper demonstrates) on the next day after the attack, Sept. 12, that the attack had been planned ten days ahead. This paper that’s published here does NOT show that the admin KNEW ten days ahead that it would happen. Those are two different things. The actual event (that our admin knew on the day after that the attack had been planned several days ahead, and then apparently willingly and knowingly promulgated the lie of it being a “spontaneous” protest) is bad enough. If we spread an incorrect conclusion, it makes us look like fools. Let’s stick to the facts, which are pretty awful in themselves.
Sorry, they had to plan and coordinate the protest in Egypt over the video and the attack in Benghazi in order to create the spontaneous lie they were telling.
This sounds so typical of Hillary and Obama. Will anyone care?
No Shit! As if this is a revelation!
The New York Times has implied that Clinton was handing out rights to 'rebuild' ... I suspect that's connected. Here's the link: http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/19/us/politics/clinton-friends-libya-role-blurs-lines-of-politics-and-business.html
< The New York Times has implied Clinton was handing out rights to ‘rebuild’ ... I suspect that’s connected. Here’s the link: http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/19/us/politics/clinton-friends-libya-role-blurs-lines-of-politics-and-business.html
Time for a hanging!
What difference does it make?
Sounds like the story of Uriah the Hittite whom King David of Israel sent to certain death to cover up the fact that David had slept with Uriah’s wife. If Stephens had been a woman I might suspect Hillary was doing in a rival. I haven’t given much attention to rumors Stephens and Obama were gay or that Obama’s former partners had ended up dead. Now I’m beginning to wonder.
I’m not sure that is the answer.
the WANTED him kidnapped
so Obama could release the blind sheik and KSM in gitmo
time will tell the TRUTH
this is not done with yet
NORE THE DEATHS OF THE OBL SEALS
I really don’t think so. It had to do with the weapons that this administration was giving to the “rebels”. I just don’t understand what it was he was to do. Unfortunately, he and his aide can’t tell us, and the responsible people at State won’t.
I want our system of justice to grind them down to small pieces of grit...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.