Posted on 05/16/2015 3:13:59 PM PDT by cradle of freedom
This is a question that I cannot figure out: Why do the Western nations open their borders to millions of Muslims? Even after all of the many terrorist attacks throughout the world, the national leaders still turn a blind eye to the inevitable tragic conflict between the two cultures even the final loss of Europe for the people who's ancestors have lived there from time immemorial. Of course, this is also happening here in the United States.
Have you asked yourself this same question? Have you found answers in your research? I would love to hear what you think.
Please only serious answers.
Coup d’etat by Islam helped by Marxism and stupidity
beyond repair.
Because the liberals running them are believers of Cloward Piven. Thats all there is to it. They hate the foundations of western civ so they will overwhelm it.
Christian guilt? Cheap labor?
Marxists see them as useful idiots
Liberals welcome the political allies.
This poop isn't news.
And that is serious.
I think you’re right Norm.
They hate the West with a passion.
God knows why. It’s where they got their wealth.
Of course, also speaking as a Christian, I know WHO wins in the end and I hope I won't be too old to participate in some good old fashion ass kicking and slaughtering of some demons.
Unfortunately (ironically?) the opposite is true.
Why did the Romans let the Visigoths in?.... because they became lazy and complacent. I can’t wait till “they” sack “Rome”. It’ll be up to the Christians to hold out against the forces of darkness, the Muslims and Marxists. They have no force for creation and will crumble. I figure that 200-300 years till they implode the world to look like one big Newark/Detroit/Russiancraphole city/Chinesecesspool city from shore to shore with only small outcroppings of the elite who will murder and destroy each other for the scraps of “power” and wealth left. All creative efforts will have been crushed by theft, taxes, and oppressive society.
I think you should have posted this in Chat, or not at all.
They have NO experience holding leaders accountable; a huge plus for Big Gummint.
They are likely to always vote for expansion of Gummint.
Notice how much harder immigration is for entrepreneurial self starters; Big Gummint types hate such people.
Its highly logical for “Progressives” so seek out future citizens steeped in corrupt dictatorship marked by patronage, nomenklatura and tribe.
To break Christianity, you need a force, and also the left knows that when everything is broken and multicultural, and there is no community or national identity, then only an all powerful government can rule over the mess and everyone will vote for more government.
“However, if there is one man who can take the most credit for the 1965 act, it is John F. Kennedy. Kennedy seems to have inherited the resentment his father Joseph felt as an outsider in Boston’s WASP aristocracy. He voted against the McCarran-Walter Act of 1952, and supported various refugee acts throughout the 1950s.
In 1958 he wrote a book, A Nation of Immigrants, which attacked the quota system as illogical and without purpose, and the book served as Kennedy’s blueprint for immigration reform after he became president in 1960. In the summer of 1963, Kennedy sent Congress a proposal calling for the elimination of the national origins quota system. He wanted immigrants admitted on the basis of family reunification and needed skills, without regard to national origin.
After his assassination in November, his brother Robert took up the cause of immigration reform, calling it JFK’s legacy. In the forward to a revised edition of A Nation of Immigrants, issued in 1964 to gain support for the new law, he wrote, “I know of no cause which President Kennedy championed more warmly than the improvement of our immigration policies.” Sold as a memorial to JFK, there was very little opposition to what became known as the Immigration Act of 1965.”
It’s partly the diversity fantasy. It’s partly to destroy Christianity. It’s partly to make America weaker so we don’t have as much influence in the world.
Liberalism would be humorous if we didn’t have to live with the results.
I think we’re all at an interesting point in history. The world has been thrown into this guilt-ridden mentality where white, “Christian” peoples feel they owe the world something. There’s been ~70 years of relative peace and calm in the world, and the latest batch of “good little citizens” are finding more ways to embrace the savages around the world through charity.
What they’re not learning are the harsh lessons of history wherein the lambs are always slaughtered by the shepherd depending on the hunger of the the same. As we continue through this peculiarity, entire societies are bowing to the savages under Mohammed by the reasoning that the Musselmen amongst us are poor, endangered souls in need of charity. In reality, they are the wolves scattering among the plurality of us waiting to strike.
I am of the opinion that a great strife and a reckoning are among us. As a Catholic, I am prepared to lay down my life in the name of the Lord. The last men to do the same were among the multitude of crusaders. I believe the newest crusades are upon us with the governments of the world backing those who wish to enslave us while the rest of us fight back the ever quickening tide of wolves trying to sack the last remaining bastions of Christian liberty around the world.
Mental illness. Mental illness magnified by group think. It feeds on itself and grows.
It is a classic propaganda technique: play to the fears of the unstable elements. Worked for Gobels. Worked well then, works well now.
You get a few charismatic types into power, they gain followers, their followers claim everyone else is bad/evil/sick/insert doubleplus ungood thing here. People, being sheep ny nature then follow so as to not be left out of the popular club. After a while they grow to believe whatever because they have themselves become as insane as their leaders.
End result: 150 million dead and counting.
Globalism...One world gov't...
To become a One World Gov't, we all must be as one...There are what are referred to as first world countries and of course we know of the third world countries...The goal is to make them indistinguishable from each other...
A world where there is no allegiance to a Nation or Country...They can not have a Country where the gov't is controlled by the people, which is supposed to be what the U.S. is...
Illegal immigrants coming into this country have no allegiance...
Can’t argue with that. Watching the Left and it’s antics in the U. S. over the last 25 years, causes one to see real possibilities there.
I think you’re very close to the target there.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.