Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Amtrak Train May Have Been Struck Before It Derailed, Officials Say
New Yoirk Times ^ | May 15, 2015 | DAVE PHILIPPS and EMMA G. FITZSIMMONS

Posted on 05/15/2015 4:20:44 PM PDT by MeshugeMikey

PHILADELPHIA — An assistant conductor on the Amtrak train that derailed on Tuesday believes she heard the engineer tell another regional train operator in a radio transmission that the train had been struck by something just before the accident, according to the National Transportation Safety Board.

At a news conference on Friday, Robert L. Sumwalt, the safety board official who is leading the investigation, said the F.B.I. had been asked to examine what he described as a fist-size impact area found on the lower left side of the train’s windshield. Officials said that the F.B.I. had been called in because it has the forensics expertise needed for the investigation, but that it had not yet begun its analysis.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: amtrak; amtrakinvestigation; derailment; philadelphia; train; trainwreck
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320321-340341-360361-375 next last
To: Ez2BRepub; NoCmpromiz; CedarDave
Those were my thoughts as I was reading the several posts above yours. If it was an electronic failure that caused the train to accelerate, in the 45 (or 60 seconds) prior to the crash, there certainly would've been a few "Oh, sh!t"s or even "mayday"s (do they still say that?) uttered over the airwaves.

If not, then it would seem like the engineer calmly accelerated with intent to do harm, not unlike how that French co-pilot calmly descended that Germanwings Airbus into the Alps a few months back.

341 posted on 05/17/2015 6:17:53 AM PDT by mellow velo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 332 | View Replies]

To: MeshugeMikey
Earlier this week, VladTepesblog posted the following mention as well: Did a Projectile have anything to do with Amtrak Crash? Derailment and Crash of Amtrak Train from Washington to NYC, passing through Port Richmond in NE Philadelphia

Also, the morning following the derailment, Fox and Friends interviewed a surviving passenger on the Amtrak derailment, NJ Police Officer identified as Michael Keene. Keene was lauded by other survivors as a passenger turned heroic rescuer on that derailed Amtrak train.

Not discussed further but worthy of mentioning again, this officer specifically stated he was returning home from DC having attended certain events related to honoring our nation's law enforcement officers as described online:

National Officer Safety And Wellness Awards To Be Presented At Chairman's Dinner Event During National Police Week Washington, May 12, 2015 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- Late last year, the National Law Enforcement Officers Memorial Fund, in partnership with the U.S. Department of Justice's Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA) and BJA's VALOR officer safety initiative, launched the Destination Zero Project to highlight agency-level achievements in the area of officer safety and wellness. The primary objective of the program is to drive down causal factors that kill and injure law enforcement officers, and to help officers live safer, happier, healthier lives. The result of this project will culminate with presentation of the inaugural National Officer Safety and Wellness Awards at the National Law Enforcement Officers Memorial Fund's annual Chairman's Dinner on Tuesday, May 12, 2015.

Begs the question...given the current politically charged 'anti-police' climate...were these 'police related' events and the timing of attending officers departure via Amtrak, merely coincidence - given multiple reports of 'projectiles' reaching trains travelling in that same location ?

Partial transcript from Fox & Friends video clip mentioned above:

Fox&Friends: 'It's My Job' Heroic Police Officer Reacts After Helping Train Crash Victims

342 posted on 05/17/2015 7:47:36 AM PDT by wtd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wtd

I so hope that there’s no connection between the “passenger list” ..and the train derailment or the projectiles said to have hit the three trains.

Given todays social climate...anything is possible


343 posted on 05/17/2015 11:22:52 AM PDT by MeshugeMikey ("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill ><>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 342 | View Replies]

To: MeshugeMikey

Anyway to find out how many law enforcement were on all 3 trains?


344 posted on 05/17/2015 12:35:56 PM PDT by easternsky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 343 | View Replies]

To: easternsky

that could be a challenge. but I’d bet if one were to contact the train operator...amtrak they might cooperate if they were aware of the passensgers connections to law enforcement.


345 posted on 05/17/2015 12:40:57 PM PDT by MeshugeMikey ("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill ><>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 344 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
It's doubtful a foreign projectile would have any material impact on the train's speed or rate of acceleration.

This happened in a populated area. The foreign projectile was likely a rock thrown by kids - pranksters. We all know what a decent-sized rock can do to an automobile windshield. The big question for me is, is that an incidental red herring or did it play an integral role in the accident?

346 posted on 05/17/2015 2:26:51 PM PDT by Lexinom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

A VERY little bit if you consider the weight ratio of a small projectile to a train.


347 posted on 05/17/2015 2:29:33 PM PDT by Lexinom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Yes, that’s my theory as well. Largeish rock, fast train... Question is, did it have any material effect on the derailment? I suspect it’s a red herring.


348 posted on 05/17/2015 2:31:36 PM PDT by Lexinom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: MeshugeMikey

seems like a derailed train is going to be pretty dented up in general. I wonder why one dent seems so unlike all of the others.


349 posted on 05/17/2015 4:28:19 PM PDT by JohnBrowdie (http://forum.stink-eye.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnBrowdie

I suspect that we may never get all of the story


350 posted on 05/17/2015 4:30:41 PM PDT by MeshugeMikey ("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill ><>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 349 | View Replies]

To: MeshugeMikey

I think it’s much more revealing (no pun intended) that the engineer apparently had a fetish with his own dork. no telling what that twisted bastard was doing with the hand that wasn’t on the throttle.


351 posted on 05/17/2015 4:34:09 PM PDT by JohnBrowdie (http://forum.stink-eye.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 350 | View Replies]

To: JohnBrowdie

yep Very Distracted Driving..


352 posted on 05/17/2015 5:10:50 PM PDT by MeshugeMikey ("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill ><>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 351 | View Replies]

To: 22202NOVA

We did, too. Something to to at church family camp other than twiddle our thumbs.


353 posted on 05/17/2015 10:17:22 PM PDT by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: Sarah Barracuda

Ha!
Good article in WSJ about Amtrak. Gubmint subsidizes NE corridor a few bucks a ticket, while subsidizing a Chicago -San Francisco ticket >$150 per ticket.
Next time a liberal says Amtrak is underfunded ask them why it puts so much of its $$ toward leisure routes.


354 posted on 05/18/2015 4:24:40 AM PDT by madameguinot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
"...projectile ... penetrate ... faggy...”

Sometimes a paragraph is just a paragraph...

355 posted on 05/18/2015 9:59:56 AM PDT by T-Bone Texan (B.L.O.A.T. - B.I.T.S. !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: T-Bone Texan

There are folks that would make bawdy humor of the bible.


356 posted on 05/18/2015 10:56:04 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 355 | View Replies]

To: MeshugeMikey
Mikey,

The camera is by the center divider of the windshield in the lower right corner of the left windshield panel (white object) just behind the wiper blade and above the center grab-bar.

It is visible in the same location in the photo of loco 601 in post #36.

Due to union gripes, er, 'concerns' there is no camera on the interior 'watching' the engineer or even just the control desk. If there were it would add a load of useful info in this case.

357 posted on 05/18/2015 8:14:41 PM PDT by NoCmpromiz (John 14:6 is a non-pluralistic comment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: NoCmpromiz

Im thinking that there may well end up being rear facing cameras In the car very soon

Thanks.


358 posted on 05/18/2015 8:17:08 PM PDT by MeshugeMikey ("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill ><>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 357 | View Replies]

To: MeshugeMikey

The NTSB recommendation(s) in the aftermath of the 2008 Mertolink collision in Chatsworth, CA was to install both a forward facing camera and an inward facing camera. Of that recommendation only the forward facing camera was included in the regulations. As mentioned the inward facing camera was met with massive resistance from certain employee representatives...

I would suspicion that as an outcome of this accident, that second camera will now make it into the regs...

...although I will not hold my breath waiting for it since the regulatory system is slower than a (cooked) escargot. Which is slower than an uncooked one. If only slightly..

(Sorry I’m late with info today - had a lot of ‘stuff’ to do.. ;-)


359 posted on 05/19/2015 12:25:29 AM PDT by NoCmpromiz (John 14:6 is a non-pluralistic comment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 358 | View Replies]

To: MeshugeMikey

The NTSB recommendation(s) in the aftermath of the 2008 Mertolink collision in Chatsworth, CA was to install both a forward facing camera and an inward facing camera. Of that recommendation only the forward facing camera was included in the regulations. As mentioned the inward facing camera was met with massive resistance from certain employee representatives...

I would suspicion that as an outcome of this accident, that second camera will now make it into the regs...

...although I will not hold my breath waiting for it since the regulatory system is slower than a (cooked) escargot. Which is slower than an uncooked one. If only slightly..

(Sorry I’m late with info today - had a lot of ‘stuff’ to do.. ;-)


360 posted on 05/19/2015 12:25:29 AM PDT by NoCmpromiz (John 14:6 is a non-pluralistic comment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 358 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320321-340341-360361-375 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson