Ping!
“On the other hand, the technique of intermediate organ transplant into an animal is morally neutral. If a bioengineered human kidney can be made from the patients own cells, as Harold Ott at Massachusetts General is currently working to do, I see no objection to growing it inside a mouse or a pig until it can be transplanted into a human at the appropriate age.”
Sound good to me, oink oink.
“Stop the world. I want to get off for a bit...” Rbt. Frost
3D printers are churning out made-to-order bones and rudimentary organs
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3286247/posts
New 3D Printable Hydrogel Composites Created Possible Breakthrough in Human Body Part Replacement
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3285489/posts
How 3D Printing Could End The Deadly Shortage Of Donor Organs
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3264321/posts
LOL!
It's not rocket science, technically or philosophically.
Just like government so-called charity. If the donor has to be robbed with the boot and guns of government to provide said charity, it is ill-gotten gains, robbery, no longer charity.
If charity is not individually voluntary, it becomes some darker thing.
Always.
No horse jokes yet ping.
Should read: There’s a government-caused shortage...
What about simply using them as bio-incubators for engineered organs made using the new 3-D organic printing being developed?