But, but, Bill Clinton said that Hillary told him.....
There seems to be a solid connection between:
(1) donors to the Clinton Foundation,
(2) companies receiving contracts from foreign countries, and,
(3) Clinton Foundation donors receiving favorable treatment from the State Dept.
<><> Sixty companies contributed $26 million to the Clinton Foundation.
<><> Forty four of those companies also contributed to a $3.2 billion dollar fund established at the Clinton Global Initiative (a wing of the foundation).
<><> At least 25 companies made contributions to fifteen private/public partnerships set up by ex-Pres Clinton;
And who administered all of them?.......the State Department w/ Hillary at the helm.
===========================================
Congress needs to launch multiple investigations into Hillarys State Dept tenure including that of her confidantes:
<><> expense accounts,
<><> use of federal credit cards,
<><> their participation in the State Dept's disbursement of funds to "private contractors;"
<><>her possible collusion with the Clinton Foundation--using classified info as an instrument for fund-raising.
Hillary's official calendar, and her contact with foreign leaders. will tell the tale of donations to the foundation....and the Clintons profiteering off secret intel.
What about ABCNBCCBSCNNMSNBCNYTIMESWAPO?
I’m sure the Dems are scrambling trying to find out what GOP Foundations Condi Rice supported and was lobbied by...
George Stephanopoulos can provide the correct, objective reasons for what appears to be corruption and influence peddling:
Coincidence
No quid pro quo
Old news
What difference, at this point, does it make
Not a shred of evidence
Accounting errors
Bush (Reagan, Lincoln, Washington) did it too
Right-wing conspiracy
Koch Brothers
Juanita Broaddrick (Paula Jones, Vince Foster, Ron Brown) were asking for it
Bkmrk.
Thanks for all of YOUR outstanding posts/work, Liz. Schweizer is on Beck’s radio show now. HOORAY Peter!
He is saying "We didn't trust her".
Flat out bribery. The Clintons should be arrested. It would be easy to trace the money and the final result of the bribe.
You would be hard pressed to get corporations to voluntarily admit they paid for influence (a crime), putting them under oath however may produce a different story than the philanthropic one, I’m sure with the right incentive most could be persuaded to tell the truth and cooperate in a criminal investigation.
But the Clintons and their cronies have assured us that there is no pay to play going on here.