Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Krauthammer: A ‘no’ to free trade is a ‘yes’ to China
The Albuquerque Journal ^ | May 15, 2015 | Dr. Charles Krauthammer

Posted on 05/15/2015 12:03:20 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

That free trade is advantageous to both sides is the rarest of political propositions – provable, indeed mathematically. David Ricardo did so in 1817.

The Law of Comparative Advantage has held up nicely for 198 years.

Nor is this abstract theory. We’ve lived it. The free-trade regime created after World War II precipitated the most astonishing advance of global welfare and prosperity the world has ever seen.

And that regime was created, overseen, guaranteed and presided over by the United States.

That era might be coming to a close, however, as Democratic congressional opposition to free trade continues to grow.

On Tuesday, every Democrat in the Senate (but one) voted to block trade promotion – aka fast-track – authority for President Obama, which would have given him the power to conclude the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), a trade deal being hammered out with 11 other countries, including such key allies as Japan, Australia and Singapore.

Fast-track authority allows an administration to negotiate the details of a trade agreement and then come to Congress for a non-amendable up-or-down vote.

In various forms, that has been granted to every president since Franklin Roosevelt. For good reason. If the complex, detailed horse trading that is required to nail down an agreement is carried out in the open – especially with multiple parties – the deal never gets done.

Like all modern presidents, Obama wants a deal. But he has utterly failed to bring his party along.

It’s not just because for six years he’s treated all of Congress with disdain and prefers insult to argument when confronted with opposition, this time from Democrats like Elizabeth Warren. It’s also because he’s expended practically no political capital on the issue. He says it’s a top priority. Has he given even a single televised address?(continued)

(Excerpt) Read more at abqjournal.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: china; economy; fasttrack; freetrade; obama; tedcruz; trade
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 last
To: nathanbedford
If you were to back the "Kraut" into a corner and made him pick a way to fund the US government and gave him the choice of either continuing income taxes or replacing income taxes with tarries/sales/user taxes I believe he would choose the former; like all good progressives they want their cake and eat to.

Free traitors tell us how great the free trade is at the same time supporting the progressive status quo.

61 posted on 05/15/2015 7:12:43 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: arthurus
The only trade restriction justified really is a uniform tariff for the purpose of raising revenue for the government but only if there is no income tax or national sales tax.

This cannot be said enough.

62 posted on 05/15/2015 7:16:22 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: central_va

I was being sarcastic.


63 posted on 05/15/2015 2:16:22 PM PDT by RC one (Militarized law enforcement is just a politically correct way of saying martial law enforcement.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: RC one

I usually include a /sarc tag on my sarcastic remarks.


64 posted on 05/15/2015 3:13:26 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Charles says Obama has utterly failed to bring his party along, yet, he’s willing to blame the GOP if the deal falls apart. What the?


65 posted on 05/17/2015 9:15:07 AM PDT by jamndad5 ("I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson