[Mechanicos]

The entire Show of the court is fraud:
1: Marriage was never a right nor is it a privilege - try to marry your sister to see that fact - thus its not a civil rights claim and the federal courts lack jurisdiction on the issue.
2: One-man, one-woman marriage is an establishment of religion specifically the torah and the bible. As such the government is barred “Shall not” from making any law respecting any establishment of religion.
3: Both Kagen and Ginsberg have direct conflicts of interest in the case they had before them as they both officiated at fake marriages. As such, under every Judaical ethics’ rules they were required to recuse themselves from the hearing but failed to do so.
4. None of the forgoing arguments - which are decisive - were presented.

[sickoflibs]

RE:”1: Marriage was never a right nor is it a privilege - try to marry your sister to see that fact - thus its not a civil rights claim and the federal courts lack jurisdiction on the issue”

Libs best analogy is the interracial marriage case,
Courts wont let states ban interracial marriage,

So now gays are the new blacks, if you marry heterosexuals then you must marry gays, to each other, or its discrimination against gays.

Gays=new blacks = same sex marriage.

[Morpheus2009]

1) Well, it was a right for an 18 year old to marry her biological father in New Jersey, so that point will likely become less relevant if other incest cases win approval elsewhere in the nation.