Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sherman Logan

“I was curious how much water these Roman aqueducts actually provided. Couldn’t find any. If you have any evidence, I’d be very interested.”

There were one heck of a lot fewer people then that there are now.


47 posted on 05/10/2015 7:44:44 PM PDT by The Antiyuppie ("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: The Antiyuppie

It is generally considered that Rome had a population of about a million. I was just wondering how much water that population used, relative to the amount used by modern American cities.

Also, AFAIK, the Romans never tried to irrigate massive areas using aqueducts.


54 posted on 05/10/2015 7:51:35 PM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

To: The Antiyuppie

“There were one heck of a lot fewer people then that there are now.”

In 100 AD Rome and it’s suburbs had a population of over 1.5 million.

Those ancient Roman aqueducts provided huge amounts of water.


101 posted on 05/10/2015 9:32:41 PM PDT by Fai Mao (Genius at Large)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson