Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/07/2015 7:24:34 AM PDT by george76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
To: george76

A triumph of liberalism.


2 posted on 05/07/2015 7:27:34 AM PDT by Amagi (Lenin: "Socialized Medicine is the Keystone to the Arch of the Socialist State.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

And the churches are utterly failing their children. They do not demand marriage, education, responsibility and morality. When the church fails the culture is lost.


3 posted on 05/07/2015 7:27:37 AM PDT by Louis Foxwell (This is a wake up call. Join the Sultan Knish ping list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76
This is crushing.

It can be changed, but not within the present system which rewards non-family-formation and nonmarital childbearing, and renders husbands/fathers redundant. And to change the present system and rescue people from lifelong, degrading dependency would take a revolution. I mean that literally.

4 posted on 05/07/2015 7:29:54 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o ("Stone cold sober, as a matter of fact.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76
and we wonder why some people accept this sort of dreck as culturally acceptable???




5 posted on 05/07/2015 7:30:35 AM PDT by MeshugeMikey ("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill ><>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76
A new report released by the Family Research Council’s Marriage and Religion Research Institute (MARRI) says that only 16 percent of 15- to 17-year-old teens in Baltimore have been raised in an intact, married family.

Does the figure this article cites apply to Baltimore as a whole, or only to those predominately Black neighborhoods?

If this figure applies to the entire city, then I shudder to think how few of the 15- to 17-year-olds in the mostly Black areas of town live in intact families.

Regards,

6 posted on 05/07/2015 7:30:58 AM PDT by alexander_busek (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

That’s 16% too many.

That gives them an unfair advantage!

/s, but is it necessary?


7 posted on 05/07/2015 7:31:05 AM PDT by Scrambler Bob (an icon of resistance within the oppressed patriots, who represent resilience in the face of SSV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

40. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce.

41. Emphasize the need to raise children away from the negative influence of parents. Attribute prejudices, mental blocks and retarding of children to suppressive influence of parents.

42. Create the impression that violence and insurrection are legitimate aspects of the American tradition; that students and special-interest groups should rise up and use [”]united force[”] to solve economic, political or social problems.

http://www.uhuh.com/nwo/communism/comgoals.htm


9 posted on 05/07/2015 7:36:01 AM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76
The report cites studies indicating that children who grow up in intact, married families are least likely to experience poverty during their youth, because married families generally earn higher incomes than stepfamilies, cohabiting families, divorced families, separated families, and single-parent families.

This used to be universal knowledge. It is time to jettison the present social libertinism and return to the moral standards that our ancestors knew for thousands of years.

10 posted on 05/07/2015 7:39:09 AM PDT by Petrosius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

Just recently I was talking with libinlaws about their son’s PhD dissertation.
It was, predictably, about solving all social ills through some sort of directed planning.

His conclusion was that everyone just needed jobs.

When I brought up the counter study that showed that THE correlative factor for staying out of jail and out of poverty was married parents, they of course, rejected the notion.


11 posted on 05/07/2015 7:41:24 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

“The steady expansion of welfare programs can be taken as a measure of the steady disintegration of the Negro family structure over the past generation in the United States.”

- Daniel Patrick Moynihan


12 posted on 05/07/2015 7:43:31 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

Anybody else remember how Dan Quayle was slammed and pilloried by the liberals? He observed that a popular TV show had a character who had a baby without a husband, and how TV was presenting it as just another lifestyle choice.

He was slammed mercilessly by the liberals for his statements about unwed parenting. Ever since, politicos have barely ever touched this subject.

Since it’s politically incorrect to talk about marriage and parenting and how it’s better to raise children in intact families, we’re not allowed to talk about it anymore. The fact that so many children, especially minority children, are brought up in single parent households or ad hoc circumstances, is not allowed by liberals to be discussed as among the problems of ghetto life.


13 posted on 05/07/2015 7:43:44 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

Fabulous success for the Welfare and Feminism crowd.


15 posted on 05/07/2015 7:55:03 AM PDT by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

Haven’t the asshat LIBs and the moonbat feminists told us that men are worthless, families are worthless and fathers are unnecessary? Bwahahahahahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa. Fools! Idiots!


16 posted on 05/07/2015 7:57:06 AM PDT by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

Democrats are the party of slavery.

Democrats are the party of Jim Crow.

Democrats are the party that largely opposed the Civil Rights Act and similar legislation.

Democrats are also the party of social welfare...and look at the results: in 1940, before the welfare state really got up and running, black families had a lower incidence of divorce and illegitimacy than white families (and it wasn’t all that high in either case). As of about 30 years ago, blacks had over 50% illegitimacy, and it has only deteriorated since then. We (meaning Democrats) INSIST on continuing to fund programs that make it OK to have children with no father present, which reward women for having as many kids as possible without getting married (which typically means multiple biological fathers for the kids in a given household), and continued dependence upon government for EVERYTHING. This is all about votes, and the Democrats have KNOWINGLY destroyed the future of blacks in this country by destroying the most critical social unit in any society, the nuclear family.

I wish that we had more Republicans and/or conservatives coming out and saying this.


17 posted on 05/07/2015 7:59:17 AM PDT by Ancesthntr ("The right to buy weapons is the right to be free." A. E. van Vogt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

The best solution to this problem is for the gubmint to hand out free aspirin, along with instructions on how to hold one between your knees.


19 posted on 05/07/2015 8:06:48 AM PDT by jimbug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

breed like animals raised like animals live like animals and then blame WHITEY....FU
HEY NEGROES......STRAIGHTEN OUT YOUR OWN ACT...


23 posted on 05/07/2015 8:30:07 AM PDT by zzwhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

And of that 16%, how many actually live in the home?


28 posted on 05/07/2015 9:00:25 AM PDT by Mastador1 (I'll take a bad dog over a good politician any day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76
"says that only 16 percent of 15- to 17-year-old teens in Baltimore have been raised in an intact, married family. "

I feel sorry for them. Must be like living in a jungle.

29 posted on 05/07/2015 9:09:53 AM PDT by ex-snook (To conquer use Jesus, not bombs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76; Abundy; Albion Wilde; AlwaysFree; AnnaSASsyFR; bayliving; BFM; Bigg Red; ...

Maryland “Freak State” DANG!


34 posted on 05/07/2015 4:13:22 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (No Whizz, No Peace!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 3D-JOY; abner; Abundy; AGreatPer; Albion Wilde; AliVeritas; alisasny; ALlRightAllTheTime; ...

PING!


35 posted on 05/07/2015 4:14:53 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (No Whizz, No Peace!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson