Based on that then do my neighbors and myself feel we should not have a convicted child molester living in our community?
After all it is a public safety.
How about banning homosexual parades as ISIS could blow them up and that comes under safety.
We have judges today who don’t even care about the law and most of those are appointed by Democrats.
Can we not apply the same kind of Logic in that case?
A homosexual parade could be considered an affront to the profit of the Islamic death cult and could be attacked - can we ban them on that basis?
It’s all about feeling safer now.......That’s the standard..
What you posted is a good argument. Some are trying to say that we shouldn’t have a Mohammed cartoon contest because it offends Muslims and could incite violence. What about gay pride parades? Muslims are offended by gays too, and they kill them.
“We have judges today who don’t even care about the law and most of those are appointed by Democrats.”
This is the reason for the big push to federalize the police.
Federal police enforce federal laws and trials are conducted by federal judges appointed by dems.
Laws can then made by dem appointed judges without the input of the citizens and their representatives.