Replies

Roberts was solid for awhile. The court kicked butt on Campaign Finance and 2nd amendment. He is somehow compromised now, since Obamacare.
He originally was on the same side as Scalia and the conservatives and authored the original majority decision, which evolved into the dissent. Something changed that May or June that altered him completely as a Justice.

I have posted this before--I will say it again.

Everyone on Free Republican should write their Member of Congress and a Member who is also a member of House Judiciary. A really simple fix for this problem.

General discussion of Justice Roberts is widespread. The line of this topic is that the two children he and his wife adopted could not be adopted under applicable law--so the children were obtained and the adoption was accomplished illegally through a third country.

The Administration has generally threatened Roberts with some form of disclosure which also threatens the adoption proceeding in order to leverage his vote on pending Supreme Court cases.

We do not know if any of these rumors have any merit or not however Congress should immediately investigate to determine what the merits are.

.
Back to the thread.

Check out David's comment # 76.

Thanks, David.

While your #76 may offer sound advice, the situation may be beyond that.

An Administration that can blackmail a USSC Justice can, when it is finished with him, also coerce him to resign and open the way for nomination of a justice to replace him.

I.e., it can get rid of Roberts a lot faster than we can.

It would appear in the absence of political opposition of the sort that would have the guts to "Bork" a nomination (and who among us would bet on that), the balance of the court could take a sharp turn to the left.

Actually, its worse than that. Great post by the way.

Roberts wound up writing both the for and against on obamacare which he deemed a tax—yeah right.

Scalia spent at least a month trying to get him to change his mind or at least explain why he went over to the dark side. Roberts never would give him an explanation.Curious at best.

I've searched many sites, articles, etc. researching how Roberts smuggled his kids into the US from Central America.

You have to believe its an amazing coincidence that he changed his mind half way through the scotus obmacare deliberations or you can believe the truth that the regime found out about the kids and blackmailed him big time and still are.

Read the NYT article that found out the truth but backed off probably due to regime pressure even thogh it was years ago.

They learned this crap from bill and Hill who blackmailed others all the time.

http://conservativepoliticalforum.com/political-discussion-and-debate/how-roberts-was-blackmailed-to-support-obamacare/

The link above gets into it pretty good.

Heres a clip from the link above:

"Many of us have questioned what caused Roberts to switch his vote on ObamaCare at the last minute, as reported by CBS, and doing so, so late that the Conservative Justices were forced to rewrite their majority opinion to be minority dissent.

According to some sources, Roberts wrote both the majority and a large portion of minority dissenting opinions. The liberal news outlet Salon.com has a story on July 3, 2012, "Roberts Wrote Both ObamaCare Opinions", written by law professor Paul Campos, citing "a source within the court with direct knowledge of the drafting process."

In this Salon article, Campos rejects the claim that the conservative minority wrote the dissenting opinion in response to Roberts' majority opinion. Instead Campos' source indicates that Roberts authored as much as the "first 46 pages" of the dissent, a full 70%, originally intended to be the majority opinion entirely rejecting ObamaCare. Only after Roberts switched his vote at the last minute did the remaining four Justices author the final 19 pages of that dissenting opinion.

In support of this, Campos points out that it is extraordinary "in the court’s history that a dissent has gone on for 13,000 words before getting around to mentioning that it is, in fact, dissenting", and yet there are repeated references to dissent from the majority opinion in those last 19 pages.

These facts may answer that question.

Roberts Adoptions:

In 2000 Justice Roberts and his wife Jane adopted two children. Initially it was apparent that the adoptions were "from a Latin American country", but over time it has become apparent that the adopted children were not Latin American, but were Irish. Why this matters will become evident.

(I learned that Roberts' wife wanted a blonde boy and a blonde girl from her mother's home country of Cork Country, Ireland. That's where these kids are from. They took the birth parents along with the kids to Central America to(smuggle the kids into the US) do the "adoption")

In 2005 the NY Times began investigating Roberts life as a matter of his nomination to the Supreme Court by George Bush. The Times was shortly accused of trying to unseal the adoption papers and intending to violate the anonymity of the adoption process... however there is more to the story.

Drudge did an article in 2005

http://patterico.com/2005/08/04/drudge-says-new-york-times-is-investigating-robertss-adoption-records/