[Jacquerie]

I'm a bit unsure as to what you mean. Once the convention meets, the subject matter for each delegation is limited by their state statute. Did you click the Indiana statute link?

For instance if the CA legislature wants a concentration camp amendment for conservatives, at least twenty-five other state legislatures will have to empower their delegates to vote in favor.

[Still Thinking]

Did you click the Indiana statute link?

Not yet, but I will. My overall point is that liberals constantly do what they want, without consequence, and R’s play along, and we end up with these fictional, but ostensibly binding liberal laws, that everyone is expected to treat as if they were valid, or else be punished. Hopefully something like that would not occur with the assent of the delegations from conservative states.

[Moseley]

I'm a bit unsure as to what you mean. Once the convention meets, the subject matter for each delegation is limited by their state statute.

But the COS movement REJECTS those safeguards as being unnecessary. I interviewed Roman Buhler almost 2 years ago on these proposals. The COS movement has voted DOWN those safeguards repeatedly.