See, this thread was about the federal basis of both the EC and state amendments convention.
But in true hijack form, you directed me twice to halfa$$ webpage that opened with Patrick Henry smelling rats.
I think it’s becoming evident by the evasive answers and non-responses that these are ‘Nullification’ proponents. I would call them trolls but I am personally not against the notion of Nullification. If it can work, then so be it. But it has no clear guide path to follow nor process to sustain it. Hence, it has little political support and therefore I just can’t get excited about it.
Note how they argue about ‘elevating’ men and women to elective office that will understand and follow the Constitution, yet.... at the same time belittle the state legislators who they say cannot be trusted to follow their oaths.
These people are shills I am afraid. But it’s good to see their arguments because they reveal so many weaknesses.