I've read the entire Federal convention debate (Farrand's Record, not just Madison's Notes), including excerpts from the philosophers to which the debaters were referring, along with The Federalist, and the Anti-Federalist papers.
For you to suggest I haven't and should, considering the quotes in that article is to completely and willfully misrepresent its content.
You just blew it, again. This time totally.
Well, then you didn’t comprehend much what you read.
Why do Article V opponents like yourself question the founding of our republic?