“If a sufficiently high percentage of an identifiable group creates problems, it is sometimes more cost effective to not deal with that group, than to do the extra work to distinguish the good customers from the bad ones.”
_________
The same sort of rationalization that Lois Lerner and the IRS gave for focusing on conservative non-profit organizations. It was BS then, and it’s BS now.
False analogy. Lerner was not seeing conservative non-profits showing non-compliance with the law at a higher rate than Leftist non-profits. She just was going after conservatives for political reasons.
Like I said before, if an identifiable group has a profile of much-higher-than-average rate of non-payment, then it can increase profit to simply not do business with that group.