To: Army Air Corps
Why would Viet Nam attack China?
2 posted on
04/30/2015 1:48:58 PM PDT by
Fido969
To: Army Air Corps
We should be helping Vietnam, India, Japan, Taiwan and the Philippines ... for whatever they need to go AGAINST CHINA!
10 posted on
04/30/2015 1:53:23 PM PDT by
Star Traveler
(Remember to keep the Messiah of Israel in the One-World Government that we look forward to coming)
To: TigersEye
Pei Ping (in a tangential way)
11 posted on
04/30/2015 1:53:57 PM PDT by
Army Air Corps
(Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
To: Army Air Corps
But it's commie doctrine: there can never be war between communist countries. That was one of the selling points: when the whole world is communist, there will be no more war.
One more lie. What difference does it make?
12 posted on
04/30/2015 1:55:22 PM PDT by
Steely Tom
(Vote GOP for A Slower Handbasket)
To: Army Air Corps
Klub.. Sizzler??
Who names these things? Geesh.
Zinger. Kaabamster.
The multinational arms trade has some ways to go as they work the PR angle.
23 posted on
04/30/2015 2:09:21 PM PDT by
NormsRevenge
(SEMPER FI!! - Monthly Donors Rock!!)
To: Army Air Corps
Vietnam Buys Deadly New Missiles Capable of Hitting China![](http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/45145000/gif/_45145929_china_vietnam08.gif)
Since Vietnam and China border each other, wouldn't a missile capable of hitting China require a range of say about ten feet?
(yes, I know they are naval missile. I just thought the range statement was funny)
26 posted on
04/30/2015 2:11:21 PM PDT by
KarlInOhio
(Darth Obama on 529 plans: I am altering the deal. Pray I don't alter it any further.)
To: Army Air Corps
28 posted on
04/30/2015 2:13:44 PM PDT by
DJ Taylor
(Once again our country is at war, and once again the Democrats have sided with our enemy.)
To: Army Air Corps
Thanks to Hillary! peace is breaking out all over.
29 posted on
04/30/2015 2:15:06 PM PDT by
1010RD
(First, Do No Harm)
To: Army Air Corps
In the late 70s China invaded Vietnam just to kick their rear end. Vietnam would love to get revenge.
31 posted on
04/30/2015 2:16:34 PM PDT by
Hillarys Gate Cult
(Liberals make unrealistic demands on reality and reality doesn't oblige them.)
To: Army Air Corps
“Deadly missile?” Versus the non-lethal type of missile?
38 posted on
04/30/2015 2:38:53 PM PDT by
subterfuge
(Minneseeota: the laughingstock of the nation - for lots of reasons!)
To: Army Air Corps
Since VietNam and China share a border, I could throw a (smaller) missile across the river and hit China. This is not a major technological achievement.
40 posted on
04/30/2015 2:43:31 PM PDT by
Teacher317
(We have now sunk to a depth at which restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men)
To: Army Air Corps
The headline writer is none too swift. “Capable of hitting China,” is a rather weak claim. It basically means functional, seeing that the two countries have a common border.
47 posted on
04/30/2015 6:11:01 PM PDT by
The_Reader_David
(And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson