Skip to comments.
Sotomayor: We’re not taking away your liberty, because we won’t force you to marry a gay person
LifeSiteNews ^
| 4/29/15
| Ben Johnson
Posted on 04/30/2015 8:55:52 AM PDT by BlatherNaut
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-114 next last
To: BlatherNaut
We won’t force you to marry a gay person...? Not yet!
To: BlatherNaut
If you refuse to marry the homosexual couple they will take away your freedom.
Pray America is waking
22
posted on
04/30/2015 9:09:53 AM PDT
by
bray
(Cruz to the WH)
To: BlatherNaut
What a moron.
Is she then going to also stipulate that the state cannot force you to cater to cater or officiate a same sex wedding?
23
posted on
04/30/2015 9:10:09 AM PDT
by
aquila48
To: alloysteel
People won’t be forced to marry a gay but will Christian churches be forced to marry gays?
To: TexasFreeper2009
I’ve tried that MANY times. I even asked why cant 20 people get married to 20 other people and have a 40 person marriage.
They then launch into some thing about “we are only talking about 2 people” TOTALLY DESTROYING THEIR POSITION THAT THEY WANT “MARRIAGE EQUALITY”!
To: BlatherNaut
“And we’re asking you to affirm every individual’s fundamental liberty interest in deciding the meaning of marriage.”
Exactly, Justice. I affirm that. Thus, the government should not coerce an individual to accept a definition of marriage that violates their religious principles.
I gave her pass on the phrase “fundamental liberty interest”. What on earth does that mean?
To: fwdude
interpretation ... Want Liberty? Support Homo liberty only or board the cattle car!
27
posted on
04/30/2015 9:16:39 AM PDT
by
no-to-illegals
(Do what is Right ... Take This Freepathon Over the Top!!!)
To: BlatherNaut
“I suspect even with us giving gays rights to marry...
Typical Leftist. They think they bestow rights. Our rights come from God, not from man (or from a wise Latina, for that matter)
28
posted on
04/30/2015 9:17:20 AM PDT
by
bk1000
(A clear conscience is a sure sign of a poor memory)
To: VanDeKoik
There is no doubt they should also authorize a threesome..since it is a frequent combination. Plus..there is no problem with a father marrying a son to pass down the family fortune.
29
posted on
04/30/2015 9:17:24 AM PDT
by
Oldexpat
To: BlatherNaut
"Every single individual in this society chooses, if they can, their sexual orientation, or who to marry or not marry."
Whoops, Sandra needs to get back on message - gay is NOT a choice, it is genetic, it is "what people are."
Well, kinda, sorta. Because we are also told that gender is a social construct, and that it is unfair to force people to accept the gender indicated by their sexual organs.
We are also told that gender is something that can be a result of mere "self-identification," that it can change, and that there are no hard-and-fast boundaries between gender categories.
So homosexuality is genetically-based, except when it isn't, or . . . whatever.
To: Oldexpat
Libs can provide NO rationale for prohibiting threesome, foursome, or fivesome marriages, or marriages between close relatives or parent and an adult child.
To: Steve_Seattle
stop making sense ... is too confusing to those not understanding sense ... Please!
32
posted on
04/30/2015 9:19:51 AM PDT
by
no-to-illegals
(Do what is Right ... Take This Freepathon Over the Top!!!)
To: BlatherNaut
Not "forcing" us to marry a gay person! Is this woman stupid or nuts or what???
All sex education "forces" the idea of gay sex as healthy and good.
Kids are being "forced" to not judge others.
If we watch TV we are "forced" to accept a lifestyle that is at its core disgusting.
If we dare to voice an opinion or sell a cake without a gay couple on top of it we are "forced" to accept the wrath of the entire gay media.
And then we are sued for making them feel bad.
Good Lord!! This lady is stupid beyond repair.
33
posted on
04/30/2015 9:19:57 AM PDT
by
Slyfox
(If I'm ever accused of being a Christian, I'd like there to be enough evidence to convict me)
To: bolobaby
Rice? Code-word for white.
34
posted on
04/30/2015 9:20:55 AM PDT
by
Scrambler Bob
(an icon of resistance within the oppressed patriots, who represent resilience in the face of SSV)
To: Slyfox
35
posted on
04/30/2015 9:21:01 AM PDT
by
combat_boots
(The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto!)
To: BlatherNaut
Any member of SCOTUS who has performed a gay wedding should recuse themselves from this case.
36
posted on
04/30/2015 9:21:46 AM PDT
by
Slyfox
(If I'm ever accused of being a Christian, I'd like there to be enough evidence to convict me)
To: BlatherNaut
” This case isn’t about how to define marriage, he said. It’s about who gets to decide that question. Is it the people acting through the democratic process, or is it the federal courts?”
Isn’t it interesting that in the case of obamacare Roberts scolded us by telling us, hey don’t expect us to bail you out from your dumb political choices, in a case where he actually had the obligation to do so, yet in this case they’re going to tell us your political choice doesn’t matter.
37
posted on
04/30/2015 9:21:53 AM PDT
by
aquila48
To: wardaddy; mulligan
This woman is not brightI wonder if she graduated from the same schools as Baltimore Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake?
38
posted on
04/30/2015 9:23:23 AM PDT
by
TYVets
To: Rummyfan
So they should. But the unwise Latina has a different opinion.
...
She didn’t come close to comprehending what he actually said.
39
posted on
04/30/2015 9:25:30 AM PDT
by
Moonman62
(The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
To: aquila48
Someone needs to ask a liberal politician of journalist: Do you think it is fair and proper to fine a Christian baker $135,000 for not baking a cake for a gay wedding? (This has happened in Oregon.)
Put THEM on the spot. Make them say, "Yes, we believe people should be financially ruined for opposing gay marriage. MAKE THEM SAY IT. Ask Obama the question, ask Hillary, ask Andrea Mitchell, ask Diane Sawyer.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-114 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson