Posted on 04/29/2015 4:30:00 PM PDT by NYer
Edited on 04/29/2015 4:37:06 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
The Supreme Court heard arguments about the legality of same-sex marriage bans yesterday. Both the
(Excerpt) Read more at aleteia.org ...
Ping!
That is an interesting take. I heard someone discussing it and said that Justice Roberts could join the gay marriage advocates by saying that denying two men or two women to marry each other would be “illegal due to laws against sex discrimination.”
How are they going to get the Indians working in HR to properly advise their workers about benefits when the laws are different depending on the state from which the employee is calling?
Mutual masturbation is dignified. Got it.
If so, why did they even take this case?
To sanction for gay marriage in a religious way by
the government IS an establishment of religion and
unconstitutional on it’s face.
Another wedge driven into the constitution by the liberal
statists who find it an impediment to their agenda.
Hopefully to smack down lower courts who ignored the admonition to leave it to the states.
The deviants demand that we dignify their practices of ****** each other and ********* each other and they want us to accept it when they ***** each other and they want the right to ******** in public.
Maybe they can actually BE dignified and eschew practices that can’t even be mentioned on a family-friendly site!
Using that argument, any combination or number of people or animals or objects could declare they were discriminated against. There would be no limit to anything called a wedding.
Truth?
So now they are being asked to rule the federal government must tell the states to regulate marriage, forcing them to include sodomy.
No, they can’t. Their goal, along with soetoro / jarrett / soros and the left is the destruction of Judeo Christian Western Civilization.
Regardles, it is time to start taking away government power at all levels.
These people think they are gods and we are their subjects. It is time for all this to change and these people never to be in any position of power over anyone else, ever again.
The multi-nationals can go to Hell, their workforces and profits don’t trump my 1st Amendment rights, nor Constitutional Federalism!
He may do that and Kennedy may find his “ right to dignity” compelling enough once again to ignore the fact that the Constitution and the 14th Amendment are silent on same sex marriage. That is the price we pay for allowing 9 human beings to be our lords and masters.
In the name of tolerance, gays will eliminate freedom of speech, freedom of belief beyond a dark corner of one’s house and freedom of association from public.
That is reason enough to say “no!”
… Even Justice Stephen Breyer got in on the act, noting that marriage understood as the union of a man and a woman “has been the law everywhere for thousands of years among people who were not discriminating even against gay people, and suddenly you want nine people outside the ballot box to require states that don’t want to do it to change … what marriage is to include gay people.” He concluded: “Why cannot those states at least wait and see whether in fact doing so in the other states is or is not harmful to marriage?”
Maybe they learned their lesson from Roe v Wade about the perils of preempting the democratic process.
Yeah, this is all theater, homosexual marriage is a forgone conclusion.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.