Posted on 04/29/2015 4:30:00 PM PDT by NYer
Edited on 04/29/2015 4:37:06 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
To which somoene should ask him if allowing males, that present as males, into the same restrooms his wife and daughters use would also be sex discrimination.
So, maybe the rumors about Roberts’ gayness are true. A sham of a marriage and adopted daughters out of preference for men?
I guess that theory would also give credence to him being blackmailed into giving some of his "judgments".
The reason the court took up this appeal was based on an appellate court’s ruling for State’s rights and the will of the citizens desire to define marriage as one woman, one man. There are at least 4 justices that are hypocrites based off previous rulings.
I don’t even want to capitalize any mention of courts in today’s world anymore. They are neither proper or just; hey are baseless, bias, and corrupt in the grand scheme of things.
Homo marriage is by definition sex discrimination itself given that it always excludes one of the sexes.
Anyway, this is a very lame argument that is not worthy of the chief justice. It would be like saying prostate cancer research, treatment etc. is illegitimate because it does not help women. Human DNA and the whole continuation of humans into the future is solidly and 100% a product of heterosexuality. If that is discrimination then it is in the sense of natural selection. It is what it is.
Soem things just are. It is only discrimination in the sense that truth discriminates against error.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.