Are you sure? I remember talks about a certain amount being withdrawn over time, but my failing memory tells me it was Obambi who pulled everyone out beforehand and notified the world before hand. If I'm wrong, then it's Bush's fault. It's Obambi's fault for not insisting on his watch a Status of Forces agreement.
As I mentioned in this or another thread, Rand Paul is correct that we shouldn't have deposed Saddam nor Kaddafi and left vacumns for ISIS. Kaddafi was under control. We could have also controlled Saddam without total warfare. Of course, both caused the so-called Arab Spring. Now the ME is exploding and our Resident and SOS claim we have a good "deal" with Iran, as they deny it every day.
You are not wrong. The agreement signed by Bush was for the full combat role to be drawn down and then the long term role to be negotiated later. You are remembering correctly the actual facts, not just liberal talking points circulated by Obama and his allies in the press after the ISIS fiasco exposed the folly of the policy he pursued.
Yes.
See Article 24 (Withdrawal of American Forces from Iraq) of the agreement below:
Read more here: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2008/11/18/56116/unofficial-translation-of-us-iraq.html#storylink=cpy