Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Roos_Girl

The difference is the pet would have been returned to it’s owner, or merely walked home if not killed.

Right now she is facing charges, and perhaps loss of her license, evidently using the excuse it was on her property isn’t as solid as you think.

It is especially weak for a woman who wants to work as a veterinarian, and win community support.


183 posted on 04/27/2015 1:55:29 PM PDT by ansel12 (LEGAL immigrants, 30 million 1980-2012, continues to remake the nation's electorate for democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies ]


To: ansel12

Sure, if you knew who the owner was. But it was neither tagged nor collared, and since it wasn’t mentioned (or I didn’t see it) I doubt it was chipped. The cat would have gone to animal services, done it’s time and then been put down either by gas or overdose.

That she could lose her license over this is ridiculous.


190 posted on 04/27/2015 2:02:08 PM PDT by Roos_Girl (The world is full of educated derelicts. - Calvin Coolidge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson