Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

History, but VDH writes it so well!
1 posted on 04/27/2015 7:04:57 AM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: afraidfortherepublic

VDH, spot on and excellent...as usual.


2 posted on 04/27/2015 7:07:32 AM PDT by Jane Long ("And when thou saidst, Seek ye my face; my heart said unto thee, Thy face, LORD, will I seek")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: afraidfortherepublic

We have seen this movie before. I feel like it’s “Groundhog Day” all over again. Back in the 90’s we saw Begala, Carville and Davis like Jack in the boxes jumping on TV to defend the Clintons. Here it is 2015 and they are back, albeit a little balder and a little grayer, doing it all over again.


4 posted on 04/27/2015 7:12:58 AM PDT by Old Retired Army Guy (frequently.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: afraidfortherepublic
Hillary Clinton will be nominated by the Democrats and has at least a 50/50 chance of being elected president.

HRC will never be elected president. Ever. Her chances of getting the nomination; less than 25% IMO.

5 posted on 04/27/2015 7:19:33 AM PDT by Poison Pill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: afraidfortherepublic

It’s a certainty the Left will excuse and defend Hillary, but they will not elect her. The Independents will be the deciders. A few states, maybe four, will be the deciders if all else breaks the same as usual.

There are more Independents now than ever (mostly because Republicans are quite repulsed by the R Party) and having an increasing number of Independents does not bode well for Clinton, imho.


6 posted on 04/27/2015 7:23:34 AM PDT by RitaOK ( VIVA CRISTO REY / Public education is the farm team for more Marxists coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: afraidfortherepublic

I usually can refrain from doing so, but I couldn’t resist needling a lib acquaintance about Hillary’s scandals. He replied with, “I don’t know much about it” (willful ignorance,) “They all do it” (false equivalence,) and, finally, “What’s my choice—to vote for a REPUBLICAN?” with REPUBLICAN spit out as an Aushwitz survivor might pronounce “Nazi.”


8 posted on 04/27/2015 7:26:51 AM PDT by TruthShallSetYouFree (The left is on that other site, so I left that other site)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: afraidfortherepublic
1.That the accusations are “old news.”

2.That the accusers are funded by right-wing conspiracists.

3.That everyone does what the Clintons did.

4.That the media pick on the Clintons.

5.That there is no hard evidence (because they have destroyed documents) that would ever lead to a criminal case. And:

6.That they are moving on, to work on behalf of the folks.

Hanson gets it - explains Clinton Sociopath 101 Logic...

9 posted on 04/27/2015 7:27:19 AM PDT by GOPJ (Dead Broke Hillary Dodged Sniper Fire With Her Immigrant Parents In Tuzla - Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: afraidfortherepublic

The Clinton’s with the help of Obama and the corrupt DOJ will avoid prosecution. However, I doubt they can avoid the IRS and will be paying back a lot of money to donors and that probably will all but end the phony Clinton Foundation. I can see Bill giving one of his aw shucks speeches blaming bad accounting for the fraudulent payments and tearfully telling about all the poor folks his foundation “helped” The bottom line is Hillary will withdraw from the presidential race citing something like her health as the reason. I think the Clinton’s greed will finally be their undoing.


11 posted on 04/27/2015 7:37:51 AM PDT by The Great RJ (Pants up...Don't loot!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: afraidfortherepublic

You know how you can tell when a Clinton is lying?

James Carville’s lips are moving really fast.


12 posted on 04/27/2015 7:38:48 AM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: afraidfortherepublic

“Hillary Clinton will be nominated by the Democrats and has at least a 50/50 chance of being elected president”

Nope.

She’ll be out of the race in 3 months.


13 posted on 04/27/2015 7:43:45 AM PDT by Jim Noble (If you can't discriminate, you are not free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
Candidate Hillary was on the stump posing as the "champion of the underclass"----
she wholeheartedly blasted high-paid CEOs, and billion dollar hedge funds----

So into herself she cannot recognize her own self-serving hypocrisy. Her own daughter has no job--so how do Chelsea and hunbby afford a $10 million condo--the costly furnishings and upkeep? And expenses for high-end living?

==========================================================

Chelsea and hubby Marc Mezvinsky's $10 million condo.

============================================

Chelsea's husband runs a hedge fund that gained access to investors who had ties to the Clintons---even as reports surfaced that Mezvinsky's hedge fund had "underwhelming" returns.

The WSJ reports extensively on the fund's underperformance since its inception. Also reported was Mezvinsky's mediocre investing and strategizing. Back in 2011, Mezvinsky, now 37, and two former Goldman Sachs colleagues — Bennett Grau and Mark Mallon — began raising money for Mezvinsky's Eaglevale Partners LP hedge fund. Some of Eaglevale's investors included Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankfein. Blankfein, a slavish Democrat supporter, said he had "always been a fan of Hillary Clinton."

==============================================

The Clinton/Goldman Sachs connection sounds awfully familiar. Then-Pres Clinton's WH
aide Rahm Emanuel also worked as a Goldman Sachs lobbyist.....both at the same time.

Not to forget this....

Then-US Sen Clinton and US Sen Jon Corzine. Corzine was fresh out of Goldman Sachs
executive suite. Remember, Wall Street makes money disappear faster than a cream puff at a
Weight Watchers weigh-in.

18 posted on 04/27/2015 7:55:50 AM PDT by Liz (Another Clinton administration? Are you nuts?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: afraidfortherepublic
"The utter moral collapse of the House of Clinton is, of course, a national disgrace. But the shame is not because the Clintons are what they are — grifters in ties and pantsuits. Rather, the liberal community’s neglect of three decades of their amorality reminds us what progressivism has become: a psychological squaring in which abstract caring allows privileged people to enjoy their material bounty without guilt over where it came from or how it is used."

Can't get much more spot on that that.

21 posted on 04/27/2015 8:42:25 AM PDT by Reo (the 4th Estate is a 5th Column)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: afraidfortherepublic

Victor left out Hillary’s standard claim that all of the scandals are mere “distractions.”


22 posted on 04/27/2015 8:50:47 AM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson