Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dan in Wichita
What's often overlooked in these discussions is this: If Hillary Clinton was really a credible candidate for the White House, she would have been nominated in 2008. She wasn't nominated in 2008, which meant her presidential aspirations were derailed by Democrats.

I don't see anything that has changed in advance of 2016. If anything, it's worse for her among the Democrat core. They have plenty of good reasons never to trust a wealthy white woman who: (1) spent six years on Wal-Mart's board of directors, and (2) is indistinguishable from a candidate who would run as an inside-the-Beltway Republican.

40 posted on 04/26/2015 8:10:06 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("It doesn't work for me. I gotta have more cowbell!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child

Good point. It’s a reminder that they already shunted her aside one time before she had accumulated even more baggage. For some reason, someone up there in the leftist stratosphere didn’t want her.


74 posted on 04/26/2015 8:58:38 AM PDT by mrsmel (One Who Can See)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson