Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xzins

[[Although, since this is a requirement to conduct a civil wedding as part of a job description, then how does recusal apply to an act?]]

As in there shall be no religious test for hiring judges- there is no requirement/question for qualification that says the judge must perform gay marriages that clearly violate a religious concept of marriage between man and woman only- once you demand that they answer yes to gay marriage, you are applying a ‘religious test’ to the qualifications for acceptance as judge- You are telling that person they can not be a judge unless they agree to do something that will violate their personal religious belief- you are saying their personal religious belief disqualifies them from office- which would be a violation of ‘no religious test’ law

(I believe, I’m no lawyer- and don’t know much law- I’m just trying to think through this systematically)


43 posted on 04/22/2015 10:56:39 AM PDT by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: Bob434

Very well thought out points if you don’t mind me saying.


45 posted on 04/22/2015 11:07:50 AM PDT by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson