Just out of curiosity, since “a lawyer can refuse to take a case...based on...beliefs”, why do judges (lawyers almost always) find it odd that a baker would want to refuse a case based on beliefs?
WOW extremely very good question.
because the law is ‘upper class’ and bakers are ‘lower class’ and apparently don’t deserve the same protections/rights as upper classes
(The law is supposed to apply equally to ALL regardless of position, color, race, or whatever- but obviously it doesn’t- which is why rangel and bawney fwank and ilk get away with what they do