To: imardmd1; ridesthemiles; stephenjohnbanker; Drew68; Mount Athos; MrB; dinodino; Blood of Tyrants; ..
RE :”
It is unlawful to selectively photograph people and use those photographs without their permission, “ ???? WTF are you kidding??
Show me the law that says he can attack her and destroy her camera. Don't bother , there is none.
Police on duty legally have zero expectation of privacy in situations like this. This cop needs to be at least fired.
57 posted on
04/21/2015 11:05:52 AM PDT by
sickoflibs
(King Obama : 'The debate is over. The time for talk is over. Just follow my commands you serfs""')
To: sickoflibs
58 posted on
04/21/2015 11:08:52 AM PDT by
NRx
(An unrepentant champion of the old order and determined foe of damnable Whiggery in all its forms.)
To: sickoflibs; Impy; stephenjohnbanker; NFHale; fieldmarshaldj; Clintonfatigued
Like I say: “The 90% of sh**head cops give the 10% that are decent a bad name.” And I have current and retired LEO’s that are family. They don’t argue with me when I say the above statement to them.
I’m far from a fan of the Jesse Jackson/Al Sharpton/race pimp gang, but if the time to choose a side ever comes, I might find myself choosing a side I never thought I would.
76 posted on
04/21/2015 2:08:51 PM PDT by
GOPsterinMA
(I'm with Steve McQueen: I live my life for myself and answer to nobody.)
To: sickoflibs
That is not what I said. Please read what I said. I said nothing about attacking a photographer. The person photographed may bring a civil suit against the photographer. Taking a person’s photograph without his/her permission is an invasion of ones privacy.
81 posted on
04/21/2015 8:16:18 PM PDT by
imardmd1
(Fiat Lux)
To: sickoflibs
87 posted on
04/22/2015 8:14:33 AM PDT by
stephenjohnbanker
(My Batting Average( 1,000) (GOPe is that easy to read))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson