Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sickoflibs

That is not what I said. Please read what I said. I said nothing about attacking a photographer. The person photographed may bring a civil suit against the photographer. Taking a person’s photograph without his/her permission is an invasion of ones privacy.


81 posted on 04/21/2015 8:16:18 PM PDT by imardmd1 (Fiat Lux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]


To: imardmd1
RE:”That is not what I said. Please read what I said. I said nothing about attacking a photographer. The person photographed may bring a civil suit against the photographer. Taking a person’s photograph without his/her permission is an invasion of ones privacy.”

No its not, maybe posting online it is in some specific cases, and that's the websites problem.

Regardless, that doesn't apply for police on duty. They have no right to that type of privacy. Common sense should tell you why.

82 posted on 04/21/2015 8:24:46 PM PDT by sickoflibs (King Obama : 'The debate is over. The time for talk is over. Just follow my commands you serfs""')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson