Replies

I don’t like either of those stances, and it does cause me to mistrust them.

Actually what you said is you didn't trust either of them, I even linked to that quote. I also asked you about what you meant, and instead of explaining you tried to avoid dealing with what you had said. You come on to these Walker threads, insult people who like him and try to browbeat them into believing Walker is a cheap whore of a liar, when you lie, and you have lied often enough that you should be ashamed of yourself. I'm a Cruz guy my self, but watching you pull this lying crap is disgusting. I've seen it before, and there is no doubt I'll see you do it again.

It was noticeable, and your proceeded prevarication and attempts to walk it back were clear.

You tried to lie your way out of it, but I've seen this before over and over with you.

You pretend to be the smartest person on FR, you exaggerate what you know, try to browbeat people like a little brownshirt, and you outright lie to people.

I'm used to it, I call you on it, and you hate that I do so, and the cycle repeats. It's who you've become, I just point it out.

I don’t like either of those stances, and it does cause me to mistrust them.

Actually what you said is you didn't trust either of them, I even linked to that quote.

Mistrust? You don't know that "didn't trust them" and "miustrust them" are the same thing? This is a restatement of the prior comment. That's all it is.

Actually, I wasn't seeking to provide a quote to you. I was further explaining my thoughts on the subject, and you didn't grasp the true meaning of this, or how it fit into the dynamics of our conversation either.

LakeShark, I expect you to reveal at least some basic communicative skills when we converse. I said something very plain and simple, and you responded by asking me what I meant by it. I wasn't going to play that game with you. I expect you to know English and be able to comprehend simple short sentences. If you can't, then that explains why you don't understand so many issues we discuss.

I also asked you about what you meant, and instead of explaining you tried to avoid dealing with what you had said.

Once again, if you can't grasp short simple clear sentences, please refrain from trying to discuss issues with me. There could be no mistaking what I meant with that short sentence. There could be no mistaking what I meant with the sentence above. This is not a statement of avoidence. I didn't deflect or disavow what I had already said. I restated it a bit differently. That is all. As an U. S. Citizen that knows, or shoud know English, you should be able to figure this out on your own. That you obviosuly can't, is revealing.

Is English your second language? I'm not trying to insult you by asking, but perhaps I should know. If it is, I'll try to help out as best I can by simplifying my comments even more for you. And that would be difficult considering how simple these sentences were. None the less, you didn't understand them.

You come on to these Walker threads, insult people who like him and try to browbeat them into believing Walker is a cheap whore of a liar, when you lie, and you have lied often enough that you should be ashamed of yourself.

Look at your tactics when dealing with me on this thread, and then come back and try to tell me again that I browbeat you into anything. I have discussed this with you and defended my stance.

Walker revealed himself to be exactly what type of person he is. I have explained what I thought about it. If my words weren't true, folks could listen and discover that for themselves. That seems rather open and honest to me.

Okay, look, I accepted you saying this in the midst of your other rants. I asked you to link me to a place where I lied. You didn't bother.

You not providing one instance where I lied, I'll leave it to others to determine for themselves who should be ashamed of themself.

I'm a Cruz guy my self, but watching you pull this lying crap is disgusting. I've seen it before, and there is no doubt I'll see you do it again.

I'm not confident you're a Cruz supporter. Just sayin'. I'm still waiting for that link, and you're beginning to repeat yourself adnausium.

It was noticeable, and your proceeded prevarication and attempts to walk it back were clear.

"I don’t like either of those stances, and it does cause me to mistrust them."

How anyone could read this and think it was walking back my earier statement, I don't know. It is an addition to my earlier statement. I was wasn't a retraction or a statement that conflicted with my first in any way.

Once again, your English and comprehension skills are seriously in question.

You tried to lie your way out of it, but I've seen this before over and over with you.

Yeah, you already made this charge four times and have implied it two or three other times. This post of yours could have been boiled down to a few short sentences, but you must have fealt it would be very revealing, if you said the same thing five or six times over and over. I have provided your comments and am providing responses to each of them.

You pretend to be the smartest person on FR, you exaggerate what you know, try to browbeat people like a little brownshirt, and you outright lie to people.

Five. And now you stoop to calling me a brown-shirt because I say what I think about parts of a Walker interview, point out why, and link folks to the interview so they can listen for themselves.

You are doing exactly what you acuse me of doing. I'm not doing it, but you are. You can't even grasp that. If I'm lying here, folks will know. They will know because I have linked them to proof.

Walker lied. I linked people to it. You say I've lied. Link me to where I have. You say I do it all the time. Where's your link?

I'm used to it, I call you on it, and you hate that I do so, and the cycle repeats. It's who you've become, I just point it out.

I'm comfortable with folks reading this post from you, and my response to it.

They will determine who is playing the role you accuse me of playing here.