Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoughtyOne; caww; odds

Caww is correctly about “softer sides uniting” — Shias, Sunnis, Ibadis, Ismailis etc. would unite against Christians.


296 posted on 04/27/2015 3:47:17 AM PDT by Cronos (ObamaÂ’s dislike of Assad is not based on AssadÂ’s brutality but that he isn't a jihadi Moslem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 260 | View Replies ]


To: Cronos; caww

>>>”Caww is correctly about “softer sides uniting” — Shias, Sunnis, Ibadis, Ismailis etc. would unite against Christians.”<<<

There is more than “one side” to everything; and as far as most Iranian (ruling) mullahs are concerned, there is No “softer side”. Though the Iranian Mullahs are willing to make deals within their limits, just as the Saudi regime is http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3280974/posts?page=278#278 (presumably others in non-Islamic world too!)

The above is as much about politics & power struggle as it is about religion and religious ‘denomination’ in the Islamic world.

I’m going to take a raincheck on Caww’s claim for now, way I see it. As I believe bringing in a “softer side” & “uniting against Christians” (real, unreal or surreal) will take more than the Islamic world; and, it is not country specific.

What do we know... it could even take what is said in this post: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3280974/posts?page=266#266 — personally, the words in this link are what I infinitely prefer - it was once, was progressing quite well, and can be again.


299 posted on 04/27/2015 4:35:50 AM PDT by odds
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 296 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson